|
|
AGENDA
Ordinary Council Meeting Tuesday, 26 March 2019 |
|
I hereby give notice that an Ordinary Meeting of Murray River Council will be held on: |
|
Date: |
Tuesday, 26 March 2019 |
Time: |
6:00PM |
Location: |
The Venue, Moama Bowling Club 6 Shaw Street, Moama |
Des Bilske General Manager |
Ordinary Council Meeting Agenda |
26 March 2019 |
4 Conflict of Interests Declarations
5.1 Confirmation of minutes from the Ordinary Council Meeting held 26 February 2019.
9 Notices of Motion/Notices of Rescission
10 General Manager’s Report & Supplementary Matters
10.1 Council's Resolution Tracker
10.2 Change of Venue for remaining Council meetings up to and including September 2019.
10.3 Barham Deb Ball - Request for funding
10.5 National General Assembly 2019 - Motion
11 Director Corporate Services Report & Supplementary Matters
11.1 Financial Statements & Investments as at 28 FEBRUARY 2019
11.2 Adoption of Travel and Accommodation Policy
11.3 Audit and Risk Management Committee Minutes of Meeting on 5 March 2019
11.4 Corporate Services Update
12 Director Engineering Report & Supplementary Matters
13 Director Planning & Environment Report & Supplementary Matters
13.1 Environmental Services Report
17.3 Murray Downs - Future Business Development
1 Acknowledgement of Country
26 March 2019 |
File Number: -
Author: Rosemarie Lewandowski, Administration Officer Project
Authoriser: Des Bilske, General Manager
That the minutes of the Ordinary Meeting of Murray River Council held on 26 February 2019 be confirmed as a true and correct record. |
Discussion
Murray River Council held its Ordinary Meeting of Council on Tuesday 26 February 2019 commencing at 6:00pm in the Tatalia Room, Upper level Rich River Golf Club, 24 Lane Moama.
A copy of the draft minutes are attached for ratification by the Council at this meeting.
1. Ordinary
Meeting of Council_26 February 2019_MINUTES_DRAFT ⇩
26 March 2019 |
6 Deputations
At this stage of the meeting, being 6:00pm, Mark Langenbacher (Planright) made a deputation to the Council regarding Item [13.2] of the Director of Panning and Environment] Report - [DA 10.2015.43.3].
At this stage of the meeting, being 6:10pm, Martin Dunan (Owner) made a deputation to the Council regarding Item [13.2] of the Director of Panning and Environment] Report - [DA 10.2015.43.3].
26 March 2019 |
10 General Manager’s Report & Supplementary Matters
File Number: -
Author: Rosemarie Lewandowski, Administration Officer Project
Authoriser: Des Bilske, General Manager
That Council receives and notes the status of previous resolutions of Council on both manual and INFOCOUNCIL Resolution tracker reports. |
Background
The Council Resolutions Tracker has been prepared to allow Councillors to review the status of their decisions (resolutions) at Council Meetings.
The manual Tracker comprises two (2) lists – ‘active’ and ‘completed’ and includes all resolutions from the previous meetings of the Council that require action. The resolutions that are reported by Council’s officers as complete will drop off the ‘active’ list and be captured on the ‘completed’ list.
The Resolutions Tracker from INFOCOUNCIL is attached along with the previous manually generated Tracker which will be archived once all resolutions on it have been completed.
Discussion
For Council information.
Strategic Implications
5 - Strategic Theme 5: Leadership and Governance
5.1 - An effective, efficient and progressive Council that provides leadership to the community
5.1.1 - Council decision making takes into account the needs and priorities of our local communities and the longer term social, cultural, economic and environmental viability and sustainability of our region
Budgetary Implications
Nil.
Policy Implications
Nil.
Legislative Implications
Nil.
Risk Analysis
· What can happen? Directors and or staff do not follow up on the resolutions.
· How can it happen? Resolutions being overlooked or misplaced
· What are the consequences of the event happening? Resolutions not being completed in a timely manner
· What is the likelihood of the event happening? Low
· Adequacy of existing controls? Executive assistant and Admin assistant email the resolutions to Council Officers for actioning. EA and AA follow up with reminders to Council Officers for completion of resolutions.
· Treatment options to mitigate the risk? Due diligence undertaken by administration and Council Officers
Conclusion
The Council Resolutions Tracker has been prepared to allow Councillors to review the status of their decisions (resolutions). The Tracker was introduced in September 2018 and includes all resolutions made by Council after that period that require action. The resolutions that are reported by Council’s officers as complete will drop off the manual ‘active’ list and be captured on the ‘completed’ list.
The INFOCOUNCIL list will contain both active and completed actions for a period of three months. This process will take place for every Council Meeting.
1. Infocouncil
Resolution Tracker_20190314 ⇩
2. Manual
Resolution Tracker_March 2019 ⇩
26 March 2019 |
File Number: -
Author: Des Bilske, General Manager
Authoriser: Des Bilske, General Manager
That Council agree on Moama being the location for the remainder of council meetings up to and including September 2019.
|
Background
Council has agreed to hold evening meetings for the remaining scheduled Council meetings for 2019. Council has been requested to consider holding the remaining scheduled Council meetings at Moama.
Discussion
The following matters have been identified for consideration:
1. The majority of councillors will find it easier with the council meeting being held in Moama.
2. As most of the development is predominately in Moama this should provide for more members of the public being able to attend the meetings.
3. Having remote councillors stay overnight may allow for additional workshops on the day following council meetings.
4. Conducting workshops and council meetings at the same time reduces the overall travel costs.
5. Continuation of the "Meet the Councillor" sessions at various locations around the area will allow better interaction between the public and council than at formal meetings.
6. Arrangements for webcasting of the council meetings in the near future will allow all members of the public to access council meetings from any location that has internet access.
Strategic Implications
5 - Strategic Theme 5: Leadership and Governance
5.2 - Engaged community leadership
5.2.3 - Foster community leadership opportunities and development
Budgetary Implications
There will be minimal budgetary implications of this report.
Policy Implications
Murray River Council Code of Meeting Practice (POL101).
Legislative Implications
Local Government Act 1993.
Risk Analysis
· What can happen?
Confusion as to where the meetings are located
· How can it happen?
If members of the public do not read the papers or check the website for the location of meeting.
· What are the consequences of the event happening?
Members of the public do not attend the council meeting in the right location
· What is the likelihood of the event happening?
Extremely low
· Adequacy of existing controls?
Adequate
· Treatment options to mitigate the risk?
Advertise new venues and meeting schedule
Conclusion
There are overall benefits for council to conduct all scheduled council meetings at a venue in Moama.
1. Ordinary
Council meeting dates and times upto and including September 2019 ⇩
26 March 2019 |
File Number: -
Author: Beck Hayward, Economic Development Officer
Authoriser: Des Bilske, General Manager
1. That Council provide the Barham Deb Ball with a $500 Quick Response Grant for the 2019 Deb Ball. 2. That Council approve including the Barham Deb Ball on the list of events to receive an annual grant in 2019-20.
|
Background
The Barham and District Debutant Ball will be held in the CluBarham auditorium on 12 April 2019. Eight debutants and their partners are actively taking part in the planning and preparation of the event. The young people have also been assisting with fundraising activities.
The event will cost approximately $3,750 to stage, with funds being raised through donations, fundraising activities and ticket sales. Council provided a $500 contribution to both the 2017 and 2018 events and has been approached to fund the 2019 event.
Discussion
The request for funding from the Barham Deb Ball was received in March and the event will be held in April, which means it is outside the window to apply for a grant under round 2 of Council’s Community Grants Program.
Under the program guidelines retrospective funding of events is not permitted. The only avenue open to council to grant funding for the 2019 event is through the Quick Response Grant which can be used under the following conditions;
QUICK RESPONSE GRANTS
The intended purpose of the Murray River Council Quick Response Grant is to provide council with an opportunity to fund worthy and extraordinary opportunities that were not able to be considered for funding as part of the community grants process.
The quick response grant offers financial support to not-for-profit community organisations and groups for extraordinary and worthy projects, equipment, events, exhibitions, or performances which contribute positively to the Murray River community.
The Quick Response Grant aims to:
· Enable council to fund projects that have not previously been considered for funding.
· Enable council to support opportunities that are one-off, or which have arisen outside of application periods for other council financial assistance.
· Assist council to deliver identified objectives, priorities and strategies that align with the Community Strategic Plan.
The Deb Ball should have been included in the list of projects to receive annual funding. We are still transitioning to Council’s new Financial Assistance Policy and it will take time to ensure all relevant projects are included in the annual contributions schedule and are funded in the most appropriate manner.
Strategic Implications
3 - Strategic Theme 3: Social Wellbeing
3.2 - Actively create opportunities to encourage and support community connectedness
3.2.2 - Encourage community events and celebrations
Budgetary Implications
Council has allocated $10,000 in its budget for Quick Response grants. $2,000 of this has already been allocated. Therefor a budget of $8,000 remains available for Quick Response Grants.
Policy Implications
Murray River Council Community Financial Assistance Policy (POL109).
Legislative Implications
Nil
Risk Analysis
· What can happen?
The event does not proceed
· How can it happen?
Lack of funding
· What are the consequences of the event happening?
The event does not proceed
· What is the likelihood of the event happening?
Very unlikely that the event will not proceed
· Adequacy of existing controls?
The committee are well organised to run the event
· Treatment options to mitigate the risk?
Not required.
Conclusion
It is appropriate for Council to allocate $500 from its Quick Response Grant towards the Barham Deb Ball for their 2019 event and for the event to be added to the list of annual contributions received in 2019-20.
1. Barham
Deb Ball request for funding ⇩
26 March 2019 |
File Number: -
Author: Kerri Keogh, Manager Office of the General Manager
Authoriser: Des Bilske, General Manager
That the Mayor, or his representative, attends the ANZAC Day Services in the towns of Barham/Koondrook, Mathoura, Moama, Moulamein, Piangil/Tooleybuc, Wakool and Echuca on Thursday 25 April 2019, and a lay a wreath on behalf of the Murray River Council community. |
Background
Anzac Day, 25 April, is one of Australia’s most important national occasions. It marks the anniversary of the first major military action fought by Australian and New Zealand forces during the First World War. Australians recognise 25 April as a day of national remembrance, which takes two forms. Commemorative services are held across the nation at dawn – the time of the original landing, while later in the day, former servicemen and servicewomen meet to take part in marches through the country’s major cities and in many smaller centres. Commemorative ceremonies are more formal, and are held at war memorials around the country. In these ways, Anzac Day is a time at which Australians reflect on the many different meanings of war.
It has been common practice for a Council representative, namely the Mayor and Councillors, to attend each of the local ANZAC Day Services within the Council area and lay a wreath on behalf of the Murray River Council community in memory of returned and fallen servicemen and servicewomen.
Discussion
ANZAC Day falls on Thursday 25 April this year. Council has been advised of the following services within the Murray River Council area and surrounds:
MATHOURA (organised by Mathoura RSL Sub Branch):
· Dawn Service (6AM) at the Mathoura Cenotaph, Soldier’s Memorial Gardens, followed by breakfast at the Soldier’s Memorial Hall
· 11AM Commemorative Service* at Murray Shire Hall (Conargo St) and afterwards a march to
the Soldiers Memorial Gardens for a further short wreath laying ceremony, followed by a luncheon at the Mathoura Bowling Club.
MOAMA (organised by Moama RSL Sub Branch):
· Dawn Service* (5:55AM) at Moama Cenotaph, Kerrabee Soundshell, immediately followed by a Gunfire Breakfast at Moama RSL
· 9AM Commemorative Service* at Moama Cenotaph, Kerrabee Soundshell
PIANGIL & TOOLEYBUC (organised by Piangil RSL Sub Branch):
· 9:30AM Commemorative Service* at Piangil Community Hall
WAKOOL:
· 3:00PM Commemorative Service* at Wakool Memorial Hall, followed by a march to the Wakool Cenotaph for a short wreath laying ceremony
ECHUCA (organised by Echuca RSL Sub-Branch):
· 11AM Commemorative Service* at Echuca War Memorial, Civic Centre Gardens, Hare St
*An invitation has been extended to the Mayor, or a representative, to attend this service and lay a
wreath on behalf of the citizens of Murray River Council.
Although contacted by Council prior to this report being presented, advice has not been received by the organisers in relation to the ANZAC Day services in both Barham and Moulamein. These details will need to be provided to Councillors at a later date, but generally are as follows:
BARHAM (organised by Barham RSL Sub Branch):
· Dawn Service (6AM) at Barham Cenotaph (Cnr Murray & Noorong Sts), followed by a Breakfast at cluBarham
· Commemorative Service – TBA
MOULAMEIN:
· Dawn Service (6:15AM) at The Triangle Park (Brougham St)
· 10:45AM March (assemble at Business Centre by 10.30am)
· 11AM Commemorative Service at The Triangle Park (Brougham St)
In addition to Council representation at the above services, Council will also be donating books relating to the war/ANZAC Day to all school libraries in the Council area.
Strategic Implications
5 - Strategic Theme 5: Leadership and Governance
5.1 - An effective, efficient and progressive Council that provides leadership to the community
5.1.3 - Build and maintain strong partnerships and relationships with all stakeholders especially our local communities, while also building effective working relationships with our neighbouring councils
Budgetary Implications
· Cost of wreaths x 7 @ approx. $60 per wreath.
· The Moama RSL Sub-Branch has requested Council to supply access to power and seating for 200 for the ANZAC Day services at the Moama Cenotaph.
· Purchase of books x 11 (8 x Primary; 3 x Secondary) for donation to schools = $154.05.
Policy Implications
Nil
Legislative Implications
Nil
Risk Analysis
· What can happen?
No Council representation at ANZAC Day services in the Council area.
· How can it happen?
No invitations are received by Council from the organisers of an ANZAC Day service OR Councillors are unable to attend the ANZAC Day services in the Council area.
· What are the consequences of the event happening?
No Council representation at an ANZAC Day service due to Council not formally being advised by the organisers of an ANZAC Day service.
· What is the likelihood of the event happening?
Medium.
· Adequacy of existing controls?
High.
· Treatment options to mitigate the risk?
Advise organisers of ANZAC Day services in the Council area that Council requires formal advice (through letter or email) of an ANZAC Day service to enable appropriate representation at same.
Conclusion
ANZAC Day falls on Thursday 25 April this year. There are a number of Dawn and Commemorative Services being held throughout the Murray River Council area. The Mayor, or a representative, have been invited to attend Commemoration Services and lay a wreath on behalf of the citizens of Murray River Council.
26 March 2019 |
File Number: -
Author: Kerri Keogh, Manager Office of the General Manager
Authoriser: Des Bilske, General Manager
1. That Council supports the proposed motion, as included in the report, for submission to the National General Assembly 2019 to be held in Canberra on 16-19 June. 2. That the General Manager, on behalf of the Council, submit the motion, as included in the report, to the National General Assembly 2019 to be held in Canberra on 16-19 June before the close off at 11:59pm on Friday 29 March. |
Background
The National General Assembly (NGA) of Local Government is held in Canberra each year in the month of June. The NGA is an opportunity for councils to discuss matters and make resolutions that are aimed at strengthening the capacity of local government to provide services and infrastructure in Australia.
Each year the Australian Local Government Association (ALGA) calls for motions that fit within the
published criteria of:
1. be relevant to the work of local government nationally;
2. be consistent with the themes of the NGA;
3. compliment or build on the policy objectives of your state and territory local government association;
4. be from a council which is a financial member of their state or territory local government association;
5. propose a clear action and outcome; and
6. not be advanced on behalf of external third parties that may seek to use the NGA to apply pressure to Board members or to gain national political exposure for positions that are not directly relevant to the work of, or in the national interests of, local government.
The NGA will be celebrating 25 years in 2019! Over the last 25 years, the NGA has provided a platform for Local Government to address national issues and lobby the federal government on critical issues facing the sector.
The theme for the 2019 NGA is ‘future focused’, this theme acknowledges that the NGA will be held after a federal election and councils need to come together as a sector to ensure their voice is heard by the incoming government to deliver in collaboration for local communities.
ALGA is calling for Notices of Motions for NGA 2019 and has prepared a discussion paper (refer ALGA website) that explores data that identifies critical areas local government needs to consider now and into the future. The purpose of the discussion paper is to provide guidance in the development and submission of motions for debate. Motions should be lodged no later than 11:59pm on Friday 29 March 2019.
Discussion
At the Ordinary Meeting of Council of 22 January 2019, the Council resolved as follows:
Resolution 100119
Moved: Cr Thomas Weyrich
Seconded: Cr Nikki Cohen
That Murray River Council notify the General Manager of possible motions for submission to the National General Assembly 2019 to be held in Canberra on 16-19 June before the close off at 11:59pm on Friday 29 March.
Carried
One motion was received for consideration by the Council, as follows:
THAT the National General Assembly (NGA) requests that the Commonwealth Government:
1. Consider legislation which will give the power to the Commonwealth Government to oversee the role of state agencies who are responsible for investigating corruption and poor governance in local government.
2. As part of this legislation, the Commonwealth would be able to appoint a federal investigative body if it becomes apparent that due diligence has not been applied at state level.
3. That local government officials who report corruption or poor governance have an appropriate body at Commonwealth level to consult with and report to when they have concerns regarding the investigative process at State level.
BACKGROUND All Australian states and territories are regulated by the Local Government Act. With local government not being recognised under the Constitution, local government is reliant upon state government to oversee and regulate the functions of local government.
Although in principle, this structure should be an effective model in ensuring good governance, the reality is far removed from this. The overwhelming majority of public officials and elected members perform their roles with honesty, integrity and with the best interests of all Australians, but unfortunately there are a small minority who continue to flout the rules knowing that the likelihood of any action ever being taken against them is quite low.
Once a public official or elected member who has breached regulations leaves a local government area, councils are very limited in the actions they can take against that person. In this case, it then becomes the responsibility of state government agencies to investigate, enforce and refer matters for potential prosecution. Due to lack of funding, resources and directions from state government, many of these agencies are struggling in these roles.
It is becoming increasingly obvious that the reputations of all levels of government are being tarnished by their inability to deal with corruption and poor governance. The Banking Royal Commission was a good example of this, where the federal government for many years would not support the inquiry. With the Royal Commission now completed, it is a national shame of the inequities that many banking customers were subjected to. It also became apparent with this inquiry that the national agency whose role it was to ensure good governance was not in the best position to do so due to lack of funding and resources.
Strategic Implications
5 - Strategic Theme 5: Leadership and Governance
5.4 - Develop and pursue advocacy on behalf of the community
5.4.1 - Pursue advocacy on key issues of importance to the community and Council
Budgetary Implications
Nil.
Policy Implications
Nil.
Legislative Implications
Nil.
Risk Analysis
· What can happen?
Council submit motions to be considered at the NGA.
· How can it happen?
Via Councillors/Senior Staff submitting motions to be considered at the NGA.
· What are the consequences of the event happening?
Nil.
· What is the likelihood of the event happening?
High.
· Adequacy of existing controls?
This matter is always reported to the Council and always seeks a resolution of the Council regarding the motions to be considered at the NGA.
· Treatment options to mitigate the risk?
N/A.
Conclusion
The National General Assembly (NGA) of Local Government is held in Canberra each year in the month of June. The NGA is an opportunity for councils to discuss matters and make resolutions that are aimed at strengthening the capacity of local government to provide services and infrastructure in Australia. The opportunity to submit potential motions to the NGA 2019 in accordance with the theme of ‘future focused’ is a chance to ensure the local government sector voice is heard by the incoming federal government to deliver in collaboration for local communities.
26 March 2019 |
11 Director Corporate Services Report & Supplementary Matters
File Number: -
Author: Anwarul Abedin, Manager Finance
Authoriser: Ross Mallett, Director Corporate Services
1. That the Officer’s report be received and noted
2. That the report detailing Council’s cashbook balance of $57,731,348.38 as at 28th February 2019 is received.
3. That the report detailing Council’s investment balance of $52,963,790.65 as at 28th February 2019 is received.
|
Background
A report showing financial statements, bank reconciliations and investments for the period ending 28 February 2019 will be distributed to councillors for consideration before the meeting.
Discussion
REPORT - BANK RECONCILIATION
Shown below are the Financial Statements, Bank Reconciliations and Investments for the period ending 28th February 2019.
INTERIM STATEMENT OF BANK BALANCES AS AT 28th FEBRUARY 2019 OF COUNCIL’S COMBINED ACCOUNTS
INTERIM INTERNAL CASHBOOK BALANCES
OVERDRAFT LIMITS: Bank Overdraft - $650,000.00.
I hereby certify that the cashbook of the various funds of Council has been reconciled, with the appropriate Pass Sheets as at 28th February 2019.
Ross Mallett
Responsible Accounting Officer
REPORT - INVESTMENTS AS AT 28th FEBRUARY 2019
As required by Section 212 of the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005 and Section 625 of the Local Government Act 1993, the details of Council’s surplus funds invested, totalling $52,963,790.65 are listed below:
Strategic Implications
5 - Strategic Theme 5: Leadership and Governance
5.1 - An effective, efficient and progressive Council that provides leadership to the community
5.1.2 - Council acts in a financially responsible manner to ensure delivery of safe and sustainable services to the community
Budgetary Implications
Current low interest rates may reduce the expected interest revenue.
Policy Implications
Investments have been made in accordance with the Council Investment Policy which was adopted on the 17th October 2017.
Legislative Implications
Local Government Act 1993.
Local Government (General) Regulations 2005.
Risk Analysis
· What can happen?
Imprudent use of council’s financial resources
· How can it happen?
Not following investment rules, policies or mandates
· What are the consequences of the event happening?
Potential loss of financial resources
· What is the likelihood of the event happening?
Low
· Adequacy of existing controls?
Good
· Treatment options to mitigate the risk?
Responsible management of financial resources invested in accordance with Council’s investment policies and mandate.
Conclusion
Murray River Council’s liquidity is in a satisfactory position at 28th February 2019.
26 March 2019 |
File Number: -
Author: Ross Mallett, Director Corporate Services
Authoriser: Ross Mallett, Director Corporate Services
That Council adopt the revised Travel and Accommodation Policy;
|
Background
It was resolved at the Ordinary Meeting of Council of 22 January 2018 that Council adopt the Murray River Council Travel and Accommodation Policy in draft and that same be placed on public exhibition for a period of 28 days to allow for public comment/submissions (resolution no.150119).
Discussion
There have been no responses in relation to the advertising of the draft Travel and Accommodation Policy.
Discussion
Areas of particular focus for change in the Policy include further clarification on:
· Policy objectives;
· the persons authorised to approve travel and accommodation;
· the persons authorised to book travel and accommodation;
· treatment of frequent flyer points;
· use of private vehicles on Council business;
· availability and use of travel allowances; and
· recording and reporting of international travel.
Strategic Implications
5 - Strategic Theme 5: Leadership and Governance
5.1 - An effective, efficient and progressive Council that provides leadership to the community
5.1.2 - Council acts in a financially responsible manner to ensure delivery of safe and sustainable services to the community
Budgetary Implications
The proposed Policy changes will support by not negatively impact on funding and budget requirements
Policy Implications
It is proposed that the Travel and Accommodation Policy be amended.
Legislative Implications
The proposed Policy changes are consistent with requirements set out in the LGA and Regulations.
Risk Analysis
· What can happen?
Travel budgets may be exceeded and travel may not be properly authorised or reported
· How can it happen?
Inadequate guidance from policy
· What are the consequences of the event happening?
Travel budgets may be exceeded and travel may not be properly authorised or reported
· What is the likelihood of the event happening?
Less likely with the amended Policy in place
· Adequacy of existing controls?
Adequate with proposed Policy amendments
· Treatment options to mitigate the risk?
Recommended that the revised Policy be adopted
Conclusion
That the proposed Policy changes will enhance guidance on travel and accommodation processes and improve control over travel expenditure.
1. Travel
and Accommodation Policy - DRAFT 22 January 2019 ⇩
26 March 2019 |
File Number: -
Author: Ross Mallett, Director Corporate Services
Authoriser: Ross Mallett, Director Corporate Services
Discussion
Attached are the draft minutes of the meeting of the Audit and Risk Management Committee held on Tuesday 5 March 2019. The minutes are subject to confirmation by the Committee at its next meeting.
Matters to be raised with Council
Audit Committee Terms of Reference
The Committee resolved to endorse for Council approval changes to the Committee Terms of Reference. The current Audit Committee Terms of Reference were approved around mid-2018. It is proposed to amend the Terms of Reference to capture the enhanced role of the Committee in oversight of:
· internal audit activities;
· financial reports required to be produced under legislation; and
· to clarify the role and activities of the Committee in communications with the internal and external auditors and convening of pre-meetings and briefings.
Riverlife
Following a request from council a pre-meeting briefing of the Committee was held on 5 March 2019 to consider the status of any potential future (financial) exposure to Riverlife Development at Barham. The General Manager reported to the Committee on the matter and the Committee noted the General Manager’s advice that there was unlikely to be any significant ongoing liability to council arising from the development
1. Audit
& Risk Management Committee Minutes - 5 March 2019 ⇩
2. Audit
Committee Terms of Reference_27 February 2019 ⇩
26 March 2019 |
File Number: -
Author: Ross Mallett, Director Corporate Services
Authoriser: Ross Mallett, Director Corporate Services
Discussion
Finance
Following the completion of the Budget Review for the quarter ended 31 December 2018 the Finance Department has been focussed on preparation of the budget for the year ended 30 June 2020 and planning for the financial audit for the year ended (YE) 30 June 2019.
The Audit Committee met on 5 March 2019 and noted the close-out of the audit of financial statements for the YE 30 June 2018 including discussion on issues raised in the Audit Management Letter relating to the audit. The Committee also reviewed progress on the completion of the internal audit plan and a risk review conducted by internal auditors (RSD Audit). The Committee also agreed to endorse for Council approval changes to the Committee terms of reference.
WH&S
There were two lost time incidents (LTI’s) since the last meeting one a soft tissue injury and the other a stress related condition. The WH&S and Risk Officer submitted his resignation and we are progressing arrangements for his replacement. During the month we formalised the Council’s first aid officer’s program.
ICT
Managers participated in a business continuity planning (BCP) exercise during the month to test Council’s procedures and readiness to apply the procedures in a BCP mock crisis. As a consequence we established a need to update our procedures to plug weaknesses identified in the BCP exercise.
Workshops were held in Moama, Mathoura and Barham to progress development of the Information and Communication Technology (ICT) strategy and key policies.
HR
Arrangements are progressing to replace the procurement manager and WHS & Risk Officer and to engage a temporary resource to fill in for the Director Planning & Environment.
Customer Service
Customer Service are in the process of preparing a customer service charter and complaints procedure for consideration by council.
26 March 2019 |
13 Director Planning & Environment Report & Supplementary Matters
File Number: -
Author: Glenn Bulmer, Manager Development Services
Authoriser: Simon Arkinstall, Director Planning & Environment
Discussion
This report details the activities of Environmental Services from 1 February to 28 February 2019.
1. Applications
Determined under Delegated Authority from 1 February to 28 February 2019 ⇩
26 March 2019 |
13.2 DA
10.2015.43.3 (DA 043/15 Amendment Two) Private Primitive Camping Ground and
Farm Building. Amendment Two Details:
Install amenities (toilets, showers & basin) in shed, removal &
modification of conditions.
File Number: -
Author: Christopher O'Brien, Town Planner
Authoriser: Simon Arkinstall, Director Planning & Environment
Applicant: Planright Surveying
Owner: Sandbar Developments P/L
Proposal: Amendment
Two: Install amenities (toilets, showers & basin) in shed, removal &
modification of conditions.
Original consent: Private Primitive Camping Ground and construction of Farm
Building
Location: Lot: 7 DP: 751152 - 4/162 Old Barmah Road MOAMA 2731
1. That the Officer’s report be received and noted; 2. That DA 10.2015.43.3 be granted partial modified development consent in accordance with Section 4.16 (4)(b) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 and the conditions outlined at the end of this report; and 3. The request to permit caravans as part of the primitive camping ground be refused as Council’s current legal advice outlines that caravans are not permitted as part of any (primitive) camping ground. |
Background
Executive Summary
DA 043/15 (10.2015.43.1) for a private primitive camping ground and construction of farm building was approved by Council on 11 April 2017. Amendment One to DA 043/15 which sought to increase the size of the approved farm building was approved under Delegated Authority on 31 January 2018. The current modified application seeks permission to install amenities (toilets, showers & basin) in the approved shed instead of a separate amenities structure. The applicant also originally sought for the removal of Condition 7 (NSW RFS condition), however during the assessment process NSW RFS provided amended conditions which the Applicant confirmed they were happy to be included on any amended consent granted. The final request forming part of the modification application is to permit caravans on site as part of the approved primitive camping ground, contrary to Council’s legal advice.
The subject site is Lot 7 DP 751152, located at 4/162 Old Barmah Road, Moama NSW 2731. The subject lot has an area of approximately 16.93ha and directly abuts the Murray River, located to the south and west. Vehicular access is provided via a carriageway easement which subsequently gains access off Old Barmah Road. The subject site contains significant native vegetation. The subject site is mapped as Flood Prone Land and the majority of the site is mapped as Bush Fire Prone Land. In respect to additional constraints of the land, the camping ground will not be located within a river front area. The subject site is flood prone however is considered acceptable for the flood hazard as the application is for a primitive camping ground and detached shed and does not involve any permanent habitable facilities.
The modified application was notified to various Government agencies, which have provided comments and recommended conditions of consent, and have been included as part of this assessment. The modified application was also notified to adjoining property owners and was advertised. No public submissions were received during the notification period.
With the exception of the request to permit caravans on the site, it is considered that the proposed modified development is appropriate, and is not inconsistent with the Murray LEP 2011 and the Murray DCP 2012, and is consistent with other relevant planning legislation affecting the site, including the relevant provisions of the Local Government (Manufactured Home Estates, Caravan Parks, Camping Grounds and Moveable Dwellings) Regulation 2005. It is therefore recommended that the proposed modified development be granted partial modified development consent subject to appropriate conditions outlined at the end of this report. The request to permit caravans on the site is inconsistent with Council’s legal advice however and therefore it is recommended this specific request be refused.
Discussion
Please see attached assessment report outlining the subject application and assessment against Section 4.15 and Section 4.55 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.
Subject Site
The subject site is Lot 7 DP 751152, located at 4/162 Old Barmah Road, Moama NSW 2731. The site is zoned RU1 Primary Production and is mapped as Flood Prone Land and REP2 – Riverine Land, along with being partially mapped as Bush Fire Prone Land, Wetlands, Watercourse, Terrestrial Biodiversity (Native Vegetation), and Key Fish Habitat (Aquatic Biodiversity).
The site has an area of approximately 16.93ha and is directly bordered by the Murray River to the south and west (which is a NSW Crown Lands River Reserve). The site is irregularly shaped and gains access via an existing carriage way easement burdening Lot 101 DP 751152, & Lot 1 DP 688650 (Whole Lot). This carriage way easement in turn gains access from Old Barmah Road.
The property contains existing native vegetation on the site, along with a large rainwater tank. An earth pad has been formed to accommodate the approved farm building. The entire property is mapped as Flood Prone Land, whilst the majority of the site is mapped as Bush Fire Prone Land. Figures 1 and 2 outline the subject site.
Figures 1 and 2 outline the subject site.
Figure 1 – Locality
Figure 2 – Aerial photograph of subject site. Subject site marked by yellow star. (Photo taken 28/12/2015)
Proposal
The amendment seeks permission to install the amenities (toilets, showers and basin) into the approved farm building instead of a separate portable building as currently approved. The associated effluent holding tank is also proposed to be moved next to the approved shed as a result of the above.
The applicant also originally sought for the removal of Condition 7 (NSW RFS condition). During the assessment process NSW RFS however provided amended conditions which the Applicant confirmed they were happy to be included on any amended consent granted.
Finally, the applicant seeks permission to remove the prohibition of caravans utilising the primitive camping ground.
The applicant has provided the following details to support the modified application:
Council staff acknowledges the request from the applicant to permit caravans as part of the approved primitive camping ground, however Council’s current legal advice outlines that caravans are not permitted as part of any (primitive) camping ground. No contradicting legal advice has been provided by the Applicant to support their request. Council staff are unable to ignore current legal advice, therefore the request to permit caravans on the site cannot be supported.
Figure 3 – Site Plan
Figure 4 – Shed plan and elevations
Figure 5 – Effluent holding tank details
Statutory Assessment Process
2.1 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
Section 1.3 Objects
Comment: It is considered that the proposed modified development is not inconsistent with the objects of the Act.
Section 1.7 Application of Part 7 of Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016 and Part 7A of Fisheries Management Act 1994
Comment: It is considered that the proposed modified development will not have a significant effect on the terrestrial and aquatic environment, threatened species, populations or ecological communities, or their habitats. The modified proposal is not considered to create any significant adverse environmental impact. It is therefore considered that the modified proposal is not inconsistent with Part 7 of the Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016 and Part 7A of the Fisheries Management Act 1994.
Section 4.14 Consultation and development consent—certain bush fire prone land
Comment: The majority of the subject site is mapped as Bush Fire Prone Land. The proposed modified development is for a special fire protection purpose and therefore was referred to NSW RFS under Clause 120 of the Regulations.
Section 4.15 Evaluation
Comment: This report provides the necessary review and evaluation of the development application. See below.
Section 4.46 What is “integrated development”?
Comment: The majority of the site is mapped as Bush Fire Prone Land. The modified application was therefore referred to NSW Rural Fire Service under Clause 120 of the Regulations.
Section 4.55 Modification of consents—generally
(1A) Modifications
involving minimal environmental impact
A consent authority may, on application being
made by the applicant or any other person entitled to act on a consent granted
by the consent authority and subject to and in accordance with the regulations,
modify the consent if:
Consideration |
Comment |
(a) it is satisfied that the proposed modification is of minimal environmental impact, and
|
The proposed modification is unlikely to cause any significant adverse environmental impacts. |
(b) it is satisfied that the development to which the consent as modified relates is substantially the same development as the development for which the consent was originally granted and before that consent as originally granted was modified (if at all), and |
It is considered that the proposed modified development is substantially the same as the original development and subsequent modification. |
(c) it has notified the application in accordance with: (i) the regulations, if the regulations so require, or (ii) a development control plan, if the consent authority is a council that has made a development control plan that requires the notification or advertising of applications for modification of a development consent, and |
The modified application was notified in accordance with the regulations outlined in Chapter 12 of Council’s Development Control Plan 2012. |
(d) it has considered any submissions made concerning the proposed modification within any period prescribed by the regulations or provided by the development control plan, as the case may be. Subsections (1), (2) and (5) do not apply to such a modification. |
All submissions have been considered during this assessment. |
(3) In determining an application for modification of a consent under this section, the consent authority must take into consideration such of the matters referred to in section 4.15 (1) as are of relevance to the development the subject of the application. The consent authority must also take into consideration the reasons given by the consent authority for the grant of the consent that is sought to be modified.
Comment: Noted. The modification application will be assessed against this criterion.
(4) The modification of a development consent in accordance with this section is taken not to be the granting of development consent under this Part, but a reference in this or any other Act to a development consent includes a reference to a development consent as so modified.
Comment: Noted.
2.2 Chronology of events and public notification and statutory referral process.
The below table provides an overview of the timeline with respect to the lodgement and assessment of the application.
Application history/timeline
Original Application approved |
11/4/2017 |
Amendment One approved |
31/1/2018 |
Modification application lodged |
30/10/2018 |
DA Panel |
15/11/2018 |
Further information requested |
21/11/2018 |
Neighbour Notification |
26/11/2018 – 2/1/2019 |
Further information received |
15/1/2019 |
Site Inspection |
7/3/2019 |
2.3 Referrals and Owners Consent
Internal Referrals |
DA Panel Engineering Department |
External Referrals |
NSW Rural Fire Service NSW DPE NSW NRAR Water NSW OEH NSW EPA NSW Murray LLS Victoria DELWP NSW DOI Lands (Crown Lands) WaterNSW MDBA Destination NSW Shire of Campaspe (Victoria) |
Advertised |
Yes - Website |
Public Notification |
The proposed modified development was notified to adjoining property owners in accordance with Murray DCP 2012 Chapter 12 – Notification Policy. |
Owners Consent |
Provided |
2.4 Contributions
Section 7.11 (formerly Section 94) Development Contributions are not required.
Section 7.12 (formerly Section 94A) Levy Development Contributions are not required.
Section 64 contributions are not required.
Town Planning Assessment
Assessment of the development application has been undertaken in respect to relevant considerations arising from Section 4.15 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 as follows:
3.1 Section 4.15 Evaluation
(1) Matters for consideration-general
In determining a development application, a consent authority is to take into consideration such of the following matters as are of relevance to the development the subject of the development application:
(a) the provisions of:
(i) any environmental planning instrument, and
(ii) any proposed instrument that is or has been the subject of public consultation under this Act and that has been notified to the consent authority (unless the Planning Secretary has notified the consent authority that the making of the proposed instrument has been deferred indefinitely or has not been approved), and
(iii) any development control plan, and
(iiia) any planning agreement that has been entered into under section 7.4, or any draft planning agreement that a developer has offered to enter into under section 7.4, and
(iv) the regulations (to the extent that they prescribe matters for the purposes of this paragraph), and
(v) (Repealed)
that apply to the land to which the development application relates,
(b) the likely impacts of that development, including environmental impacts on both the natural and built environments, and social and economic impacts in the locality,
(c) the suitability of the site for the development,
(d) any submissions made in accordance with this Act or the regulations,
(e) the public interest.
Matters for consideration
3.2(a) the provisions
3.2(a)(i) Environmental Planning Instruments
3.2(a)(i)a Murray Local Environmental Plan 2011 (Available http://www.legislation.nsw.gov.au/#/view/EPI/2011/682)
Part 1 Preliminary
Clause 1.1 Name of Plan
Comment: Noted.
Clause 1.1AA Commencement
Comment: Noted.
Clause 1.2 Aims of Plan
Comment: The proposed modified development is not inconsistent with the aims of Murray LEP 2011.
Clause 1.3 Land to which Plan applies
Comment: Noted.
Clause 1.4 Definitions
Comment: Noted.
Clause 1.5 Notes
Comment: Noted.
Clause 1.6 Consent authority
Comment: Noted.
Clause 1.7 Maps
Comment: Noted.
Clause 1.8 Repeal of planning instruments applying to land
Comment: Noted.
Clause 1.8A Savings provision relating to development applications
Comment: Noted.
Clause 1.9 Application of SEPPs
Comment: Noted.
Clause 1.9A Suspension
of covenants, agreements and instruments
Comment: For the purpose of enabling development on land in any zone
to be carried out in accordance with this Plan or with a consent granted under
the Act, any agreement, covenant or other similar instrument that restricts the
carrying out of that development does not apply to the extent necessary to
serve that purpose.
Part 2 Permitted or prohibited development
Clause 2.1 Land use zones
Comment: Noted.
Clause 2.2 Zoning of land to which Plan applies
Comment: Noted.
Clause 2.3 Zone objectives and Land Use Table (development permissibility)
Zone: RU1 Primary Production
§ To encourage sustainable primary industry production by maintaining and enhancing the natural resource base.
§ To encourage diversity in primary industry enterprises and systems appropriate for the area.
§ To minimise the fragmentation and alienation of resource lands.
§ To minimise conflict between land uses within this zone and land uses within adjoining zones.
§ To minimise conflict between land uses within this zone and land uses within adjoining zones.
Comment: It is considered that the proposed modified development is not inconsistent with these objectives.
Permissibility
Comment: The original approved development is classified as a camping ground; which means an area of land that has access to communal amenities and on which campervans or tents, annexes or other similar portable and lightweight temporary shelters are, or are to be, installed, erected or placed for short term use, but does not include a caravan park.
Camping grounds are permitted with consent in the RU1 Primary Production zone.
The proposed shed can be classed as a farm building. Under the LEP,
a farm building means a structure the use of which is ancillary to an agricultural use of the landholding on which it is situated and includes a hay shed, stock holding yard, machinery shed, shearing shed, silo, storage tank, outbuilding or the like, but does not include a dwelling.
Clause 2.4 Unzoned land
Comment: Not applicable.
Clause 2.5 Additional permitted uses for particular land
Comment: Not applicable.
Clause 2.6 Subdivision—consent requirements
Comment: Not applicable.
Clause 2.7 Demolition requires development consent
Comment: Not applicable.
Clause 2.8 Temporary use of land
Comment: Not applicable.
Part 3 Exempt and complying development
Clause 3.1 Exempt Development
Comment: Not applicable.
Clause 3.2 Complying Development
Comment: Not applicable.
Clause 3.3 Environmentally sensitive areas excluded
Comment: Noted.
Part 4 Principal development standards
Clause 4.1 Minimum subdivision lot size
Comment: Not applicable.
Clause 4.1AA Minimum subdivision lot size for community title schemes
Comment: Not applicable.
Clause 4.1A Minimum subdivision lot size for strata plan schemes in certain rural, residential and environmental zones
Comment: Not applicable.
Clause 4.1B Minimum subdivision lot sizes for certain split zones
Comment: Not applicable.
Clause 4.2 Rural Subdivision
Comment: Not applicable.
Clause 4.2A Erection of dwelling houses on land in certain rural and environmental protection zones
Comment: Not applicable.
Clause 4.2B Rural workers’ dwellings
Comment: Not applicable.
Clause 4.2C Exceptions to minimum lot sizes for certain rural subdivisions
Comment: Not applicable.
Clause 4.2D Boundary adjustments in Zones RU1 and E3
Comment: Not applicable.
Clause 4.3 Height of buildings
Not adopted
Clause 4.4 Floor Space Ratio
Not adopted
Clause 4.5 Calculation of floor space ratio and site area
Not adopted
Clause 4.6 Exceptions to development standards
Comment: Not applicable.
Part 5 Miscellaneous provisions
Clause 5.1 Relevant acquisition authority
Comment: Noted.
Clause 5.2 Classification and reclassification of public land
Comment: Noted.
Clause 5.3 Development near zone boundaries
Comment: Not applicable.
Clause 5.4 Controls relating to miscellaneous permissible uses
Comment: Not applicable.
Clause 5.5 (Repealed)
Clause 5.6 Architectural roof features
Not adopted
Clause 5.7 Development below mean high water mark
Not applicable
Clause 5.8 Conversion of fire alarms
Comment: Noted.
Clause 5.9, 5.9AA (Repealed)
Clause 5.10 Heritage conservation
Comment: The site does not contain any known items of Environmental Heritage Significance. It is the responsibility of the Applicant to ensure compliance with the Due Diligence Code of Practice for the Protection of Aboriginal Objects in New South Wales. Any consent issued will contain the standard OEH condition regarding protection of Aboriginal Cultural Heritage.
Clause 5.11 Bush fire hazard reduction
Comment: Noted.
Clause 5.12 Infrastructure development and use of existing buildings of the Crown
Comment: Noted.
Clause 5.13 Eco-tourist facilities
Comment: Not applicable.
Clause 5.14 Siding Spring Observatory—maintaining dark sky
Not adopted
Clause 5.15 Defence communications facility
Not adopted
Part 6 Urban release areas
Comment: Not applicable. The subject site is not mapped as an Urban Release Area.
Clause 6.1 Arrangements for designated State public infrastructure
Comment: Not applicable.
Clause 6.2 Public utility infrastructure
Comment: Not applicable.
Clause 6.3 Development control plan
Comment: Not applicable.
Clause 6.4 Relationship between Part and remainder of Plan
Comment: Not applicable.
Part 7 Additional local provisions
Clause 7.1 Essential services
Development consent must not be granted to development unless the consent authority is satisfied that any of the following services that are essential for the proposed development are available or that adequate arrangements have been made to make them available when required:
Subclause |
Comment |
(a) the supply of water, |
The modification does not affect this Subclause. See original assessment below:
An existing 120,000 litre rainwater tank is on site to supply the proposed development with water. Any development consent issued will include appropriate conditions of consent outlining the requirement for water supply to meet all relevant guidelines. |
(b) the supply of electricity, |
Electricity is available. |
(c) the disposal and management of sewage, |
The modification does not affect this Subclause. See original assessment below:
The Applicant has advised a portable amenities block will be utilised to service the proposed development, and that a concrete tank will be installed underneath for collection of grey and black water, which will then be pumped out. Any consent will be conditioned to ensure that the correct disposal of septic waste from the portable facilities is achieved, and in accordance with Council’s Engineering and Environmental Health Guidelines. |
(d) stormwater drainage or on-site conservation, |
The modification does not affect this Subclause. See original assessment below:
A 120,000 litre above ground water storage tank is proposed to collect stormwater from the development. It is noted that the proposed development is unlikely to cause significant amount of additional stormwater. Any consent issued will include appropriate conditions to ensure the protection of the environment and amenity of adjoining properties. |
(e) suitable road access |
The modification does not affect this Subclause. See original assessment below:
Road access is available by a carriage way easement, which in turn provides access to Moama via Old Barmah Road. Council’s Engineering Department were notified of the proposed development, and did not require any upgrade to road conditions servicing the proposed development, therefore it is considered that suitable road access is available. |
Clause 7.2 Earthworks
Comment: It is considered that the proposed modified development is not inconsistent with the objectives of this clause.
Clause 7.3 Biodiversity protection
Comment: Part of the subject site is mapped as Terrestrial Biodiversity (Vegetation). No native vegetation is proposed to be removed as part of the modified application. It is therefore considered that the proposed modified development is appropriately located on the site and is unlikely to significantly adversely impact the environmental significance of the land.
The subject site is partially mapped as Key Fish Habitat (Aquatic Biodiversity); however no works are proposed to occur within land covered by this layer.
Clause 7.4 Development on river front areas
Comment: Not applicable. The proposed modified development is to be located outside land classed as a ‘river front area’.
Clause 7.5 Riparian land and Murray River and other watercourses—general principles
Comment: Not applicable. The proposed development is setback 100m from the Murray River and therefore is not located on ‘riparian land’.
Clause 7.6 Additional provisions—development on river bed and banks of the Murray and Wakool Rivers
Comment: Not applicable. No development is proposed to occur on the river bed or bank of the Murray or Wakool Rivers.
Clause 7.7 Wetlands
Comment: The majority of the subject site is mapped as Wetlands under the Murray LEP 2011. The modified application is considered appropriate for the location, as it is unlikely to cause any significant adverse impact onto the importance of the Wetlands in the area. The modified application is unlikely to adverse effect the growth and survival of native flora and fauna, the condition and significance of the native flora on the land, the provision and quality of habitats for indigenous and migratory species, or the surface and groundwater characteristics of the site, including water quality, natural water flows and salinity. No native vegetation is proposed to be removed as part of the proposed modified development.
Clause 7.8 Flood planning
Comment: It is considered that the proposed modified development is not inconsistent with the objectives of this clause. See original assessment below:
The subject site is mapped as Flood Prone Land under the Murray LEP 2011. The 1 in 100 flood level on the site is 95.68m AHD whilst the 1 in 200 flood level is 95.86m AHD. The height of the subject site varies from 90.8m AHD to 95.13m AHD, with the majority of the land being significantly inundated in flood events. Given the nature of the proposed development, it is considered however that the proposed development is not inconsistent with the objectives of the clause. The application includes a proposed primitive camping ground, which is not to be used for commercial purposes and is proposed to be utilised only by the landowners and their families. The subject site is mapped as a High Hazard Floodway. As outlined in the Murray DCP 2012: “Primitive camping grounds will be considered provided that any permanent facilities associated with the provision of a water supply, toilet and refuse disposal are in keeping with the basic needs of the camping ground, and can be shown to withstand the force and duration of flooding, and will not adversely impact on river water quality under flood conditions”. It is considered the proposal meets these requirements. The proposed camping ground use, along with the proposed construction of a farm building, and installation of an amenities block and septic holding tank, is unlikely to cause any significant adverse impacts on flood behaviour or the environment. It is considered that any development consent issued can be appropriately conditioned to protect the natural environment.
The subject site is significantly constrained by flooding. It is considered however that the proposed development is not incompatible with the flood hazard affecting the site as the application is for a primitive camping ground, installation of an amenities block and septic holding tank, and construction of a farm building. In a flood event the proposed camping ground can be vacated well before the arrival of floodwaters.
It is considered that the proposed development will not have any significant adverse impact on flood behaviour. The proposed farm building and amenities block are considered to be of an appropriate size and unlikely to adversely affect flood behaviour. The temporary installation of campervans etc. is predicted to have a negligible impact.
The proposed camping ground will be able to be evacuated in a flood event. Given the pre warning for flood events there is unlikely to be any significant risk to life generated by the proposed development.
The proposed development is unlikely to significantly adversely impact the natural environment. The proposed development is to be setback at least 100m from the Murray River and does not require the removal of any native riparian vegetation. The proposed development is unlikely to cause avoidable erosion, siltation, destruction of riparian vegetation or a reduction in the stability of river banks or watercourses, whilst the proposed development is permissible with consent.
It is considered that the proposed development is unlikely to result in unsustainable social and economic costs to the community as a consequence of flooding. The proposed camping ground can only be used on a temporary basis and in the event of flooding occurring on the land, occupants have sufficient access to leave the property.
Schedule 1 Additional permitted uses
Comment: Not applicable.
Schedule 2 Exempt development
Comment: Not applicable.
Schedule 3 Complying development
Comment: Not applicable.
Schedule 4 Classification and reclassification of public land
Comment: Noted.
Schedule 5 Environmental heritage
Comment: Noted.
3.2(a)(i)b Murray Regional Environmental Plan No. 2—Riverine Land
Comment: The subject site is mapped as Murray Regional Environmental Plan 2 – Riverine Land.
Part 1 Introduction
Clause 1 Name of plan
Comment: Noted.
Clause 2 Aims of the plan
Comment: It is considered that the proposed modified development is not inconsistent with the aims of this plan. The proposed modified development is unlikely to significantly adversely impact the riverine environment of the River Murray.
Clause 3 Objectives of the plan
Comment: The proposed modified development is considered to be not inconsistent with the objectives of this plan. The modified application is unlikely to significantly adversely impact the riverine environment of the River Murray and will not impede in the conservation and promotion of better management of the natural and cultural heritage values of the riverine environment.
Clause 4 Where the plan applies
Comment: Noted.
Clause 5 How this plan affects other plans
Comment: Noted.
Part 2 Planning principles
Clause 6 Definitions
Comment: Noted.
Clause 7 Notes
Comment: Noted.
Clause 8 When planning principles should be applied
Comment: Noted.
Clause 9 General principles
Comment: The proposed modified development is consistent with these general principles. The modified application is unlikely to cause any significant adverse impacts upon the River Murray.
Clause 10 Specific principles
When this Part applies, the following must be taken into account:
Access
Comment: The proposed modified development is considered to be not inconsistent with this clause. No direct access to the Murray River is proposed. No development along the main channel of the River Murray is proposed.
Bank disturbance
Comment: The proposed modified development is considered to be consistent with this subclause. No bank disturbance is proposed to occur.
Flooding
Comment: The proposed modified development is not inconsistent with this subclause.
Land degradation
Comment: It is considered that the proposed modified development is not inconsistent with this subclause. No native vegetation is proposed to be removed, whilst it is considered that the modified application is not likely to cause erosion, pollution of ground or surface water, groundwater accession, salination and soil acidity, or any significant adverse effects on the quality of terrestrial and aquatic habitats. The buildings/structures proposed as part of the modified application has been suitably sited to avoid any adverse impact to the natural environment.
Landscape
Comment: The proposed modified development does not propose any native vegetation removal along the riverbank of the Murray River, or within any part of the subject site.
River related uses
Comment: The proposed modified development is required to be setback 100m from the bank of the Murray River, which is considered an appropriate outcome. Any modified development consent issued will include this requirement as a condition of modified development consent. No formal direct access to the Murray River is proposed.
Settlement
Comment: The proposed modification does not change the original assessment against this subclause. See original assessment below:
The proposed development is considered to be inconsistent with the entirety of the clause. The proposal includes a camping ground, of which can be considered to be a ‘settlement’. The subject site is mapped as flood prone land, therefore is inconsistent with this requirement. It is considered however that the proposed development is unlikely to significantly adversely impact upon flooding characteristics of the site, whilst the application is unlikely to increase risk to the community. The proposed camping ground is to be for private purposes only, and is to be primitive in nature. The application can be appropriately conditioned to ensure pollution of flood waters is avoided.
The subject site is located approximately 4.5km from the centre of Moama which is considered an appropriate outcome. The Applicant has detailed that the proposed camping ground can be appropriately serviced by all required services.
The proposal does not compromise the potential of prime crop and pasture land to produce food or fibre.
Water quality
Comment: It is considered that the proposed modified development is not inconsistent with this subclause. The proposed modified development is unlikely to significantly adversely impact or pollute water quality in the area.
Wetlands
Comment: The proposed modified development is considered to be consistent with this subclause. The proposed modified development is setback 100m from the Murray River, whilst no native vegetation is proposed to be removed. The proposed on-site sewerage management system will be required to be installed as per the requirements of all relevant legislation in order to limit any significant adverse impact occurring upon the wetlands of the River Murray.
Part 3 Planning requirements and consultation
Clause 11 Consultation—who consults and procedure for consultation
Comment: Noted.
Clause 12 General provisions for consultation
Comment: Noted.
Clause 13 Planning Control and Consultation Table
Comment: The proposed modified development was referred and advertised as a ‘camping ground’ under this plan.
Clause 14 Building setbacks—special provisions
(1) Application
Comment: This Clause is applicable under (1)(a).
(2) Building
setback
Comment: The subject site is zoned RU1 Primary Production and
directly adjoins the Murray River. All aspects of the proposed modified
development are to be setback at least 100m from the Murray River which is
considered an appropriate outcome. The proposed modified development includes a
farm building to be constructed on the subject site. The proposed shed
continues to be located in excess of 250m from the main channel of the Murray
River which is considered an appropriate outcome.
(3) Objectives
of building setback
Comment: It is considered that the proposed modified development is
consistent with the objectives of this clause.
(4) Matters to
be considered
When determining the location of a building in relation to the River Murray, in
addition to the planning principles the following specific matters should also
be considered:
(a) Effluent disposal
Comment: The camping ground will be serviced by amenities within the approved shed which is connected to a concrete storage tank for grey and black water. This facility will be required to be capped in the event of a flood occurring on the site, and this requirement will form a condition of any modified development consent granted.
(b) Landscaping
Comment: It is considered that the proposed modified development is
not inconsistent with this subclause and will ensure the continued appropriate
conservation and preservation of the natural riverine environment of the area.
No native vegetation is proposed to be removed as part of the modified
application, whilst all development is appropriately setback from the Murray
River to protect the visual amenity of riparian land.
Dictionary
Comment: Noted.
3.2(a)(i)c State Environmental Planning Policy (Exempt and Complying Development Codes) 2008
Comment: The proposed modified development cannot be classed as exempt or complying development as it does not meet all of the development requirements.
3.2(a)(i)d State Environmental Planning Policy (Building Sustainability Index: BASIX) 2004
Comment: Not required.
3.2(a)(i)e State Environmental Planning Policy No 44—Koala Habitat Protection
Comment: The subject land is not considered to be core koala habitat or potential core koala habitat.
3.2(a)(i)f State Environmental Planning Policy No 55—Remediation of Land
Comment: The subject land is not considered to be contaminated or likely to be contaminated and is not listed on Council’s Contaminated Land Register. In accordance with Clause 7 of SEPP 55, Council is satisfied that, the land is suitable in its current state for the purpose for which the development is proposed to be carried out.
3.2(a)(i)g State Environmental Planning Policy (Vegetation in Non-Rural Areas) 2017
Comment: The proposed modified development is not inconsistent with this Policy.
3.2(a)(i)h State Environmental Planning Policy (Infrastructure) 2007
Comment: Not applicable.
3.2(a)(i)i State Environmental Planning Policy (Miscellaneous Consent Provisions) 2007
Comment: Not applicable.
3.2(a)(i)j State Environmental Planning Policy No 64—Advertising and Signage
Comment: Not applicable.
3.2(a)(i)k State Environmental Planning Policy (State and Regional Development) 2011
Comment: Not applicable.
3.2(a)(i)l State Environmental Planning Policy No 1—Development Standards
Comment: Not applicable.
3.2(a)(i)m State Environmental Planning Policy No 21—Caravan Parks
Comment: Although the modified application is for a ‘camping ground’ under the Murray LEP 2011; this Policy applies as the definition of ‘caravan park’ includes ‘camping ground’ under this Policy.
Clause 3 Aims, objectives etc.
Comment: It is considered that the proposed camping ground is not inconsistent with the aims and objectives of this Policy. The proposed development is to be utilised for short-term use by the landowners and their families, whilst it is considered that the proposed development does not impact upon the social and economic welfare of the community. No community facilities are required, whilst it is considered that the environment is not significantly adversely impacted by the proposed modified development. No native vegetation is proposed to be removed. Council consent has been applied for, whilst no subdivision is proposed.
Clause 6 Definition
In this Policy:
caravan park means land (including a camping ground) on which caravans (or caravans and other moveable dwellings) are, or are to be, installed or placed.
Comment: This policy is applicable as the modified application included a camping ground.
Clause 7 Application of certain planning controls to places licensed for movable dwellings
Comment: This policy is applicable.
Clause 8 Development consent required for caravan parks
Comment: The applicant has applied for a primitive camping ground. As the modified application includes a camping ground under the Murray LEP 2011, no long-term residence sites are permitted to be developed. Any modified development consent will be appropriately conditioned to ensure compliance with the clause.
Under the Murray LEP 2011, “camping ground means an area of land that has access to communal amenities and on which campervans or tents, annexes or other similar portable and lightweight temporary shelters are, or are to be, installed, erected or placed for short term use, but does not include a caravan park”.
Clause 9 Subdivision of caravan parks for lease purposes
Comment: The Applicant has not proposed to subdivide the subject land.
Clause 10 Matters to be considered by Councils
A Council may grant a development consent required by this Policy only after it has considered the following:
(a) whether, because of its location or character, the land concerned is particularly suitable for use as a caravan park for tourists or for long-term residence,
Comment: During the original assessment it was considered that the subject site is appropriate for the proposed use (camping ground). No native vegetation is proposed to be removed and the land is not considered prime agricultural land. It is noted that no permanent sites are permitted within the camping ground (only undesignated camp sites permitted).
(b) whether there is adequate provision for tourist accommodation in the locality of that land, and whether existing or potential tourist accommodation will be displaced by the use of sites for long-term residence,
Comment: During the original assessment it was considered that there is adequate provision for the proposed tourist type development in the locality of the subject site. The proposed primitive camping ground is only to be used by the landowners and their families, and is not a commercial operation. The proposed modified development can be serviced by all required services. No undesignated camp sites will be permitted to be utilised for long-term residence.
(c) whether there is adequate low-cost housing, or land available for low-cost housing, in that locality,
Comment: The subject site is zoned RU1 Primary Production. The modified application includes a private camping ground which is a permitted land use with consent. It is noted that no long term sites are permitted as part of any camping ground consent. The modified application relates to a camping ground with undesignated camp sites to be used for short term purposes only. The locality does not readily provide land available for low-cost housing as the land is zoned RU1 Primary Production, which requires any application to construct a dwelling house to meet strict development controls.
(d) whether necessary community facilities and services are available within the caravan park to which the development application relates or in the locality (or both), and whether those facilities and services are reasonably accessible to the occupants of the caravan park,
Comment: The proposed camping ground is for private use only. It is considered that the proposed modified development includes appropriate facilities and services within the site. The submitted modified plans detail amenities within the approved shed to service the site. The proposed camping ground is primitive in nature, therefore it is considered unnecessary for more extravagant facilities. These are considered appropriate and are reasonably accessible to the occupants of the proposed private camping ground.
(e) any relevant guidelines issued by the Director, and
Comment: Planning Circular PS 05-007 issued on 14 September 2005 informs relevant stakeholders regarding the commencement of updated regulation for caravan parks and moveable dwellings (at the time of the Planning Circular issue). This Planning Circular is noted.
Section 9.1 Direction 3.2 Caravan Parks and Manufactured Home Estates is not applicable to this development application as the application is not a planning proposal.
(f) the provisions of the Local Government (Caravan Parks and Camping Grounds) Transitional Regulation 1993.
Comment: It is considered that the proposed modified development is not inconsistent with the Local Government (Manufactured Home Estates) Transitional Regulation 1993.
3.2(a)(i)n State Environmental Planning Policy No 30—Intensive Agriculture
Comment: Not applicable.
3.2(a)(i)o State Environmental Planning Policy No 33—Hazardous and Offensive Development
Comment: Not applicable.
3.2(a)(i)p State Environmental Planning Policy No 36—Manufactured Home Estates
Comment: Not applicable.
3.2(a)(i)q State Environmental Planning Policy No 52—Farm Dams and Other Works in Land and Water Management Plan Areas
Comment: Not applicable.
3.2(a)(i)r State Environmental Planning Policy (Rural Lands) 2008
Comment: The proposed modification does not alter the original assessment against this Policy. See below:
Part 1 Preliminary
Clause 2 Aims of Policy
The aims of this Policy are as follows:
(a) to facilitate the orderly and economic use and development of rural lands for rural and related purposes,
Comment: The proposed development is considered to be not inconsistent with this aim. Although the proposed development includes a camping ground and is not agricultural purposes, the proposed use will not significantly adversely impact productive agricultural land. The subject site is heavily constrained, whilst the proposed primitive camping ground will still provide a rural type setting.
(b) to identify the Rural Planning Principles and the Rural Subdivision Principles so as to assist in the proper management, development and protection of rural lands for the purpose of promoting the social, economic and environmental welfare of the State,
Comment: Noted. It is considered that the proposed development is not inconsistent with this aim. The application will not impact upon the criteria outlined above.
(c) to implement measures designed to reduce land use conflicts,
Comment: It is considered that the proposed development is not inconsistent with this aim. The proposed camping ground is unlikely to create any land use conflicts. The proposed camping ground is only ‘primitive’ in nature, whilst existing approved/exempt residential/agricultural and other uses in the locality will continue to be permitted. The proposed camping ground is appropriately located to avoid any land use conflict with nearby residential uses.
(d) to identify State significant agricultural land for the purpose of ensuring the ongoing viability of agriculture on that land, having regard to social, economic and environmental considerations,
Comment: It is considered that the subject site is not classified as State significant agricultural land.
(e) to amend provisions of other environmental planning instruments relating to concessional lots in rural subdivisions.
Comment: Noted. The proposed development is not inconsistent with this aim.
Part 2 Rural Planning Principles
Clause 7 Rural Planning Principles
The Rural Planning Principles are as follows:
(a) the promotion and protection of opportunities for current and potential productive and sustainable economic activities in rural areas,
Comment: It is considered that the proposed development is not inconsistent with this principle. The subject site is not considered productive agricultural land, whilst the proposed development has the potential to provide additional economic activity within the locality.
(b) recognition of the importance of rural lands and agriculture and the changing nature of agriculture and of trends, demands and issues in agriculture in the area, region or State,
Comment: It is considered that the proposed development is not inconsistent with this principle.
(c) recognition of the significance of rural land uses to the State and rural communities, including the social and economic benefits of rural land use and development,
Comment: The proposed development is not inconsistent with this principle.
(d) in planning for rural lands, to balance the social, economic and environmental interests of the community,
Comment: The proposed development is not inconsistent with this principle. The proposed development is unlikely to cause any significant adverse impacts to the social, economic or environmental interests of the community.
(e) the identification and protection of natural resources, having regard to maintaining biodiversity, the protection of native vegetation, the importance of water resources and avoiding constrained land,
Comment: It is considered that the proposed development is not inconsistent with this principle. No native vegetation is proposed to be removed, whilst water resources in the area are unlikely to be adversely impacted or polluted. The subject site can be classed as ‘constrained land’, however the application is for a primitive camping ground to be used sparingly, therefore it is considered that the proposed use is appropriately sited.
(f) the provision of opportunities for rural lifestyle, settlement and housing that contribute to the social and economic welfare of rural communities,
Comment: It is considered that the proposed development is not inconsistent with this principle. The proposed camping ground will provide for rural lifestyle type opportunities for the landowners whilst protecting the natural environment. The proposal has the potential to contribute to the social and economic welfare of the rural community.
(g) the consideration of impacts on services and infrastructure and appropriate location when providing for rural housing,
Comment: It is considered that the proposed development is not inconsistent with this principle. The proposed development is unlikely to adversely impact upon services and infrastructure.
(h) ensuring consistency with any applicable regional strategy of the Department of Planning or any applicable local strategy endorsed by the Director-General.
Comment: Noted. The application is not inconsistent with the draft Murray Murrumbidgee Regional Growth Plan current at the time of lodgement.
Note. Under section 117 of the Act, the Minister has directed that councils exercise their functions relating to local environmental plans in accordance with the Rural Planning Principles. Under section 55 of the Act, the Minister may also direct a council to prepare a local environmental plan.
Comment: Noted.
3.2(a)(i)s State Environmental Planning Policy (Educational Establishments and Child Care Facilities) 2017
Comment: Not applicable.
3.2(a)(ii) Proposed instruments
Comment: Draft Murray LEP 2011 applies.
3.2(a)(iii) Any development control plan
Comment: Murray Development Control Plan 2012: Amendment 5 dated 2/2/2016 applies to the proposal. Chapters 5, 6, 9, 10, 11 and 12 are relevant. Chapters 2, 3, 4, 7 are not applicable.
Chapter 1 Introduction
Comment: Noted.
Chapter 2 Residential Development
Comment: Not applicable.
Chapter 3 Industrial Development
Comment: Not applicable.
Chapter 4 Commercial Development
Comment: Not applicable.
Chapter 5 Tourist Accommodation
Comment: The proposed modification does not alter the original assessment against this Policy. See below:
The proposed development is considered to be consistent with the objectives of this Chapter which are;
· to encourage and promote development of tourist accommodation within the Shire;
· to maximise utilisation and promotion of existing tourist resources;
· to protect the natural environment;
· to provide for tourist oriented activities that are appropriately located; and
· to promote diversification of development types and forms.
Matters for Consideration |
Comment |
(a) the impact of the development on the natural environment and the means of protection to be employed against any potential effect; |
The proposed development will have minimal adverse environmental impact as it is proposed to be located on cleared land, and setback at least 100m from the Murray River. |
(b) the impact of the development on the built environment, the character of the area and significant places of heritage value |
The proposed development is unlikely to adversely impact upon the built environment in the area. No known items of environmental heritage significance are located on the site. |
(c) the proximity and means of access to an urban centre and facilities; |
The subject site is located approximately 5km from Moama and can be accessed via Old Barmah Rd and carriageway easement. This distance is considered acceptable for a private camping ground. |
(d) the impact of the development on adjoining land use activities and the amenity of nearby residents; |
The proposed development will have minimal impact on surrounding properties as the proposed camping ground is located on a large rural allotment and well distanced from property boundaries. The nearest dwelling house on adjoining NSW land is situated at least 200m from the proposed camping ground. Other properties in the area are used for agricultural activities or camping within the vicinity of the Murray River, therefore the proposal is considered appropriate. The proposed shed is appropriately setback from property boundaries to avoid any adverse impact. |
(e) the potential economic benefit; |
It is considered that the proposed development is not inconsistent with this requirement. |
(f) provision of suitable of road access and egress |
There is existing road access and egress onto Old Barmah Road, via a carriageway easement burdening Lot 101 DP 751152 and Lot 1 DP 668650. The Application was referred to Council’s Engineering Department who did not object to the granting of consent. |
(g) provision of a potable water supply; |
There is an existing rainwater tank on the site. Any consent issued will include appropriate conditions of consent outlining that a potable water supply must be available and comply with all relevant requirements. |
(h) provision of wastewater disposal facilities; |
The Applicant has applied for consent to install amenities and associated storage tank for effluent purposes. Any consent granted will be conditioned to ensure that disposal of wastewater is properly managed. |
(i) the availability of electricity and telecommunication services; |
Electricity and telecommunication services are available to the site. |
(j) natural hazards including flooding, bushfire or other risks to public safety and property; and |
The entirety of the subject site is mapped as Flood Prone Land, whilst the majority of the subject site is mapped as Bush Fire Prone Land. Given the proposed development is for a private camping ground and shed, it is considered to be acceptable for the flood hazard of the land. The proposed camping ground is to be used on a temporary basis. The application was referred to NSW RFS as integrated development. NSW RFS have responded with their recommended conditions of consent, which will be included with any development consent issued. The proposed camping ground will be required to have a satisfactory buffer to the potential bushfire source. |
(k) landscaping including retention of existing vegetation and proposed planting. |
No native vegetation is proposed to be removed, whilst the proposed camping ground is to be setback 100m from the Murray River. It is therefore considered that the proposed development is appropriate for the site and complies with the subchapter. |
The modified application has considered the appropriate provisions under the Local Government (Manufactured Home Estates, Caravan Parks, Camping Grounds and Moveable Dwellings) Regulation 2005.
Chapter 6 Strategic Land Use Plan
Comment: It is considered that the proposed modified development is not inconsistent with the Murray Strategic Land Use Plan (SLUP).
Chapter 7 Subdivision
Comment: Not applicable.
Chapter 8 Urban Release Areas
Comment: Not applicable.
Chapter 9 Vegetation Removal
Comment: No vegetation is proposed to be removed.
Chapter 10 Watercourses & Riparian Land
Subchapter |
Objectives |
Controls |
Comment |
10.1 Visual Amenity |
Consistent |
Consistent |
The modified proposal is unlikely to produce any significant adverse visual impact. The proposed development is to be setback at least 100m from the Murray River and will be camouflaged by the surrounding native vegetation in the area. The proposed shed will be setback at least 10m from all property boundaries. |
10.2 Boat Ramps |
Not Applicable |
Not Applicable |
No boat ramp is proposed. |
10.3 Pontoons and Walkways |
Not Applicable |
Not Applicable |
No pontoons or walkways are proposed. |
10.4 Retaining Walls |
Not Applicable |
Not Applicable |
No retaining walls are proposed. |
10.5 Stairs |
Not Applicable |
Not Applicable |
No stairs on the river bank are proposed. |
10.6 Moorings |
Not Applicable |
Not Applicable |
No moorings are proposed. |
10.7 Liability and Public Safety |
Not Applicable |
Not Applicable |
Not applicable. |
10.8 Landscaping |
Consistent |
Consistent |
It is considered that the modified application does not require additional landscaping to occur. The subject site contains significant native vegetation and the modified application does not propose the removal of any native vegetation. |
10.9 Unauthorised Structures |
Noted. |
Noted. |
Noted. See original comment below:
Council consent has been applied for regarding the primitive camping ground use and construction/installation of a farm building and amenities. Previous plans submitted (which have been required to be superseded) showed a number of transportable homes located within the river front area of this lot. This issue has been identified to Council’s compliance officers. The subject transportable homes will not be located on any plans which may be stamped as part of any potential consent issued. |
Chapter 11 Flood Prone Land
Comment: The proposed modification does not alter the original assessment against this Chapter. See below:
The subject site is mapped as Flood Prone Land under the Murray LEP 2011, and is classed as ‘High Hazard Flood Floodway’ in the Murray DCP 2012, located in Flood Planning Area 1. The 1 in 100 flood level on the site is 95.68m AHD whilst the 1 in 200 flood level is 95.86m AHD. The height of the subject site varies from 90.8m AHD to 95.13m AHD, with the majority of the land being significantly inundated in flood events. It is considered however that the application is consistent with the objectives of this Chapter. This Chapter outlines detailed controls to reduce the risk to occupants of flood prone land by reducing the impact of flooding and flood liability. The proposed development is unlikely to affect flood behaviour. In a flood event the proposed camping ground will not be occupied. The proposed shed is unlikely to cause any significant adverse impact to flooding, whilst it is noted that this is not a habitable building.
Considerations |
Comment |
Whether the proposed development is reasonable having regard for the flood risk and resources available to the location. Applicants should place no reliance on the implementation of a condition specifying a private evacuation/flood management plan as a means to overcome an unacceptable flood risk.
|
The subject site is significantly constrained by flooding. It is considered however that the proposed development is compatible with the flood hazard affecting the site as the application is for a primitive camping ground and shed which is not habitable. The proposed camping ground is proposed to include amenities to service the proposed development. In a flood event the proposed private camping ground can be vacated. |
The need for a benefit/cost assessment that takes account of the full cost to the community of the flood response and flood damage likely to be incurred to the development and upon other development. |
It is considered that the proposed development is unlikely to result in unsustainable social and economic costs to the community as a consequence of flooding. The proposed camping ground can only be used on a temporary basis and in the event of flooding occurring on the land, occupants have sufficient access to leave the property. |
Specific principles relating to flood liable land contained within Murray Regional Environmental Plan No.2 - -Riverine Land (MREP2) |
These principles have been assessed in the relevant section of this report. |
The Floodplain Development Manual – the Management of Flood Liable Land (2005) |
It is considered that the proposed development is consistent with the Floodplain Development Manual – the Management of Flood Liable Land (2005). The temporary installation of campervans, along with the have a negligible impact on flooding affecting the subject site. |
Chapter 12 Notification Policy
Comment: The modified Application was notified to various Governmental agencies and neighbouring properties in accordance with this Chapter.
3.2(a)(iiia) Any Planning Agreements
Comment: No planning agreements apply.
3.2(a)(iv) The regulations
Comment: The regulations have been considered in the assessment of this modified application.
Local Government (Manufactured Home Estates, Caravan Parks, Camping Grounds and Moveable Dwellings) Regulation 2005
Part 1 Preliminary
Clause 3 Object
The object of this Regulation is to provide opportunities for affordable alternatives in short-term and long-term accommodation:
(a) by continuing in force (in amended form) the standards for the design of manufactured home estates, caravan parks and camping grounds established by the former Regulations, and
Comment: It is considered that the proposed modified development is generally in accordance with this object. It is noted however that Council’s legal advice has advised that caravans are not permitted within the definition of a camping ground, therefore Council staff are unable to approve the request to permit caravans within the camping ground.
(b) by continuing in force (in amended form) the standards for the design and construction of manufactured homes and other moveable dwellings and for their siting established by the former Regulations, and
Comment: It is considered that the proposed modified development is generally in accordance with this object. It is noted however that Council’s legal advice has advised that caravans are not permitted within the definition of a camping ground, therefore Council staff are unable to approve the request to permit caravans within the camping ground.
(c) by continuing in force (in amended form) the standards to promote the health, safety and amenity of the occupiers of manufactured homes and other moveable dwellings established by the former Regulations.
Comment: It is considered that the proposed modified development is generally in accordance with the object of this Regulation. The proposed camping ground will provide additional short term accommodation opportunities for the subject site’s landowners and their families. The application is consistent with the requirements and standards of both the current and repealed regulations in relation to the design of a primitive camping ground, and in the promotion of the health, safety and amenity of the occupiers of camping grounds.
Part 3 Caravan parks, camping grounds and moveable dwellings
Division 2 Approvals and exemptions
Subdivision 1 Operation of caravan parks and camping grounds
Note. Section 68 of the Act prohibits a person from operating a caravan park or camping ground without the prior approval of the council. Part 1 of Chapter 7 of the Act deals generally with the granting, amendment, extension, renewal, revocation and modification of approvals. Approvals may be granted subject to conditions, including conditions prescribed by the regulations. Section 626 makes it an offence to fail to obtain an approval. Breach of any condition of an approval constitutes an offence under section 627 of the Act.
Comment: Noted.
Clause 71 Factors for consideration before approval is granted
Comment: Please see assessment against Subdivision 9 of Division 3. It is noted that no relocatable home, rigid annexe or associated structure is permitted to be constructed on the subject site. It is also noted that Council’s legal advice has advised that caravans are not permitted within the definition of a camping ground, therefore Council staff are unable to approve the request to permit caravans within the camping ground.
Clause 72 Matters to be specified in approval
Comment: The relevant requirements will be outlined in any approval granted.
Clause 73 Conditions of approval to operate caravan park or camping ground
Comment: The relevant requirements will be outlined in any approval granted.
Subdivision 2 Installation of moveable dwellings and associated structures in caravan parks and camping grounds
Comment: Noted.
Clause 74 Conditional exemptions
Comment: Noted.
Clause 75 Installation on flood liable land
Comment: Noted.
Clause 76 Installation of relocatable home, rigid annexe or associated structure of more than one storey
Comment: Noted.
Clauses 83 - 131
It is noted that Clauses 83 to 131 do not apply to the subject modified proposal as the applicant seeks consent for a land use defined as a ‘primitive camping ground’ under the Regulations rather than a ‘camping ground’.
Division 3 Caravan parks and camping grounds
Subdivision 9 Primitive camping grounds
Clause 132 Primitive camping grounds
(1) If an approval to operate a primitive camping ground designates one or more camp sites within that ground, then the maximum number of designated camp sites is not to exceed a mean average of 2 for each hectare of the camping ground (where that figure is the average calculated over the total area of the primitive camping ground).
Comment: The Applicant has not proposed to designate camp sites. Any approval granted will therefore not designate sites. The approval will designate an area where camping will be permitted. A condition of consent will restrict camping outside this area. Please see section (3) of this clause for more information.
(2) The following conditions apply to a primitive camping ground:
(a) if the approval to operate the primitive camping ground designates one or more camp sites within that ground—camping is not permitted within the primitive camping ground other than on those designated camp sites,
Comment: The approval will not designate sites. The approval will designate an area in which camping will be permitted. A condition of consent will restrict camping outside this area.
(b) if the approval to operate the primitive camping ground does not designate one or more camp sites within that ground—the maximum number of caravans, campervans and tents permitted to use the camping ground at any one time is not to exceed a mean average of 2 for each hectare of the camping ground (where that figure is the average calculated over the total area of the primitive camping ground),
Comment: The applicant in the original application stated that they are to have no more than ten (10) privately owned caravans on the property at any one time. It is noted however that Council’s legal advice has advised that caravans are not permitted within the definition of a camping ground, therefore Council staff are unable to approve the request to permit caravans within the camping ground. Any approval will not designate camp sites, therefore no more than ten (10) campervans and tents (excluding caravans which are prohibited) being used at any one time within the proposed primitive camping ground will comply with the requirements of the Clause given the size of the allotment.
(c) a caravan, annexe or campervan must not be allowed to be installed closer than 6 metres to any other caravan, annexe, campervan or tent,
Comment: Noted. This requirement will form a condition of consent. It is noted however that Council’s legal advice has advised that caravans are not permitted within the definition of a camping ground, therefore Council staff are unable to approve the request to permit caravans within the camping ground.
(d) a tent must not be allowed to be installed closer than 6 metres to any caravan, annexe or campervan or closer than 3 metres to any other tent,
Comment: Noted. This requirement will form a condition of consent.
(e) the camping ground must be provided with a water supply, toilet and refuse disposal facilities as specified in the approval for the camping ground,
Comment: Noted. This requirement will form a condition of consent.
(f) unoccupied caravans, campervans and tents are not to be allowed to remain in the camping ground for more than 24 hours,
Comment: Noted. This requirement will form a condition of consent. It is noted however that Council’s legal advice has advised that caravans are not permitted within the definition of a camping ground, therefore Council staff are unable to approve the request to permit caravans within the camping ground.
(g) if a fee is charged for camping, a register must be kept that contains entries concerning the same matters as are specified in clause 122 and, in addition, that specifies the size of the group (if any) with whom the person listed in the register camped,
Comment: This requirement will form a condition of any consent granted. It is also noted that the applicant has stated that the proposed camping ground is to be for private use only.
(h) such fire fighting facilities as may be specified in the approval are to be provided at the primitive camping ground.
Comment: Noted. This requirement will form a condition of consent.
(3) If the approval to operate a primitive camping site does not designate camp sites, a council may impose as a condition of the approval that the installation of tents, caravans, campervans and annexes is not permitted on a particular area or areas of land within the primitive camping ground, for reasons of health or safety or to ensure consistency with the principles of ecologically sustainable development or for any other purpose.
Comment: Any development consent granted will include a condition of consent which prohibits camping from occurring on land within a river front area. This is proposed in order to ensure consistency with the principles of ecologically sustainable development.
(4) The provisions of Subdivisions 1–8 do not apply to a primitive camping ground.
Comment: Noted.
(5) For the purposes of subclause (2) (b), in the calculation of the number of tents using a camping ground, 2 or more tents occupied by not more than 12 persons camping together as a group are to be counted as only one tent.
Comment: Noted.
3.3(b) the likely impacts of that development, including environmental impacts on both the natural and built environments, and social and economic impacts in the locality.
Environmental Impacts
Natural Environment
Comment: The modified application does not propose the removal of any native vegetation or habitat from the subject site. The proposed modified development is considered unlikely to significantly impact on the natural environment.
Built Environment
Heritage
Comment: No adverse impact is predicted to occur. Any modified consent issued will include appropriate conditions of consent regarding Aboriginal Cultural Heritage.
Watercourse
The proposed modified development will have a minimal impact on the Murray River as the proposal is to be setback at least 100m from the bank of the Murray River. The proposed modified development will increase human activity around the river and its bank however such activity is not considered to have a significant adverse impact.
Water
Comment: The subject modification does not affect this assessment. See original assessment:
The proposed development will provide potable water from tanks which will need to comply with NSW Health requirements. Campervans etc. parked on the site will only create negligible amounts of stormwater, which will not be discharged into the Murray River.
Hazards
Comment: The development site is flood and partly bushfire prone. These hazards are addressed more specifically under their individual headings.
Bushfire
Comment: Part of the property is mapped as bush fire prone land. The modified application was subsequently referred to NSW RFS, who provide conditions of modified consent.
Flooding
Comment: The subject site is mapped as Flood Prone Land. The proposed modification is not considered inappropriate for the subject site. Please see relevant sections of this report for more detail.
Waste
Comment: Waste will be collected and then disposed of into Council’s landfill though a refuse disposal facility.
Noise /Operating Hours
Comment: The subject modification does not affect this assessment. See original assessment:
The proposed use of the site as a primitive camping ground has the potential to create irregular noise from campers, however this is considered to be no different to any other camping area. The property is located in a rural locality and is well setback from the nearest residence.
Siting and density
Comment: The subject modification does not affect this assessment. See original assessment:
It is considered that the proposed primitive camping ground is appropriately sited as it is well setback from the Murray River on a cleared portion of the property which limits any impact on the riparian environment.
Amenity/Adjoining land
Comment: The subject modification does not affect this assessment. See original assessment:
The proposed development will have minimal impact on the amenity given the
primitive camping ground is proposed to occur on a rural property. The nearest
dwelling house (which is in fact located across the Murray River in Victoria)
is approximately 160m from the site of the proposed
camping ground. There is also a buffer between the proposed camping ground and adjoining rural properties. The proposed
development will have no other significant adverse impact on adjoining rural
land.
Visual impact
Comment: The proposed modified development will have minimal visual impact. The proposed camping ground is setback a minimum of 100m from the Murray River. Any camping ground approval will only permit campervans etc. to be erected / installed for short term use. The proposed farm building is appropriately setback from property boundaries to avoid any adverse visual impact.
Cumulative effect
Comment: The proposed modified development is not considered to have a cumulative effect.
Public domain
Comment: The proposed modified development is not considered to have a detrimental impact on the public domain. The property adjoins a Crown reserve which can be utilised to access the Murray River. It is important that the proposed modified development does not encroach upon this Crown reserve; therefore this requirement will form a condition of any modified development consent granted.
Access
Comment: The subject site gains vehicle access via a carriageway access easement burdening Lot 101 DP 751152 & Lot 1 DP 668650, and subsequently off Old Barmah Road. This access is considered adequate to service the proposed development.
Traffic/ Road capability
Comment: The modified proposal is for a private camping ground and farm building. It is therefore considered that the proposed modified development will have minimal traffic impact with higher traffic concentration to only occur during peak holiday times. The original application was referred to Council’s Engineering Department who did not object to the granting of consent.
Parking
Comment: The subject site contains ample room for vehicle parking.
Social Impacts
Comment: It is considered that the proposed modified development is unlikely to cause any detrimental social effects.
Economic Impacts
Comment: It is considered that the proposed modified development is unlikely to cause any detrimental economic effects. The modified application is for a private camping ground and construction of a shed on the subject site.
3.4(c) The suitability of the site for the development
Comment: The subject site is considered suitable for the proposed modified development. The allotment abuts the Murray River which provides amenity and recreational opportunities for private campers. The subject site is also in close proximity to the urban area of Moama and has satisfactory road access via a carriageway easement and Old Barmah Road. The site of the proposed camping ground is set well back from the Murray River (100m) and no native vegetation is proposed to be removed. The site is subject to flooding however these impacts are considered acceptable given the camping ground will be vacated during a flood event. It is noted however that Council’s legal advice has advised that caravans are not permitted within the definition of a camping ground, therefore Council staff are unable to approve the request to permit caravans within the camping ground.
3.5(d) any submissions made in accordance with this Act or the regulations,
Agencies
NSW NRAR Water |
No objections. |
NSW Crown Lands |
No objections subject to conditions. |
NSW OEH |
No objections subject to conditions. |
VIC DELWP |
No objections. |
WaterNSW |
No objections. |
NSW EPA |
No objections subject to conditions. |
Destination NSW |
No response. |
NSW DPE |
No response. |
VIC Shire of Campaspe |
No objections. |
MDBA |
No objections. |
NSW RFS |
No objections subject to conditions. |
Public Submissions
No public submissions were received.
3.6(e) The public interest.
Comment: The public’s interest has been considered throughout the assessment of this modified development application. It is considered that the proposed modified development will have no significant adverse impact on the public interest.
Conclusion
The proposed modified development has been assessed in accordance with the provisions of Section 4.15 and Section 4.55 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 and is considered to be partially satisfactory. The proposed modified development will not adversely impact upon Murray River Council, however it is noted Council’s current legal advice outlines that caravans are not permitted as part of any (primitive) camping ground. It is therefore recommended that partial modified development consent be granted subject to relevant conditions outlined below.
Conditions:
Ø Modified Conditions:
Condition 1
Condition 5
Condition 6
Condition 7
Condition 9
Condition 24
Condition 59
Condition 60
Condition 62
Ø Deleted Conditions:
Condition 4
Condition 41
Ø Additional Conditions:
Nil
Section 4. Conditions of Development Consent
Prescribed conditions of development consent in accordance with Division 8A of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000 that must be fulfilled
Clause 98: Compliance with Building Code of Australia and insurance requirements under the Home Building Act 1989
Clause 98A: Erection of signs
Clause 98B: Notification of Home Building Act 1989 requirements
Clause 98C: Conditions relating to entertainment venues
Clause 98D: Condition relating to maximum capacity signage
Clause 98E: Condition relating to shoring and adequacy of adjoining property
Please refer to the NSW State legislation for full text of the clauses under Division 8A of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000. This can be accessed at http://www.legislation.nsw.gov.au.
Conditions that must be fulfilled prior to the release of a Construction Certificate
1. The farm building must be constructed / installed from materials and colours that blend in with the natural riverine environment. Details of materials, finishes and colour schemes must be submitted and endorsed by Council prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate.
Reason: To ensure that the development is complimentary to its riverine environment and to comply with Murray REP No.2.
2. The proponent must identify the area designated for the camping ground on the subject site through the installation of tangible objects such as bollards and/or native landscaping. The 100m setback to the top of the bank of the Murray River must be set out by a Registered Land Surveyor. There must be no camping on land identified as ‘river front area’, which means the land within 100m of the top of the bank of the Murray River. Signage must be installed stipulating areas where camping is permitted and not permitted. Documentary evidence and details of proposed measures to identify the camping area must be submitted and endorsed by Council with the application for a Construction Certificate. These measures must be installed prior to the issue of a Section 68 Approval to Operate the Camping Ground.
Reason: To ensure compliance with Clause 7.4 of the Murray Local Environmental Plan 2011.
3. The applicant must provide Council with a detailed report from an appropriate consulting structural engineer demonstrating that the farm building can withstand the force of flowing floodwaters and buoyancy forces in 0.5% AEP flood events. If any earth pad is required for the subject farm building, all details of such earth pad must be approved by Council prior to the release of the Construction Certificate. Any earth pad must be in suitable proportion with the size of the shed. No excessive earth pad is permitted.
Reason: To ensure that the shed can withstand the impact of floodwaters and buoyancy forces associated with flooding.
4. Deleted.
5. The Applicant must submit an emergency management plan for the development prepared to the satisfaction of Council. This emergency management plan must include:
· An emergency/evacuation plan for bushfire, prepared for the proposed development consistent with the NSW Rural Fire Service document ‘Guidelines for the Preparation of Emergency/Evacuation Plan
· An emergency/evacuation plan for flood events prepared in accordance with Councils ‘guide to flood emergency planning for tourist operators’. This plan must detail how people are to be evacuated, how services will be disconnected and campervans, tents, refuse facility, amenities etc. removed in the event of a flood.
Reason: To comply with the Murray Development Control Plan 2012 and NSW Rural Fire Service requirements.
6. The Applicant must submit to Council an appropriate stormwater management plan prior to the release of a Construction Certificate. Details in respect to stormwater management must be submitted to and endorsed by Council prior to the issue of a Section 68 Approval. Stormwater disposal on the property must be to the satisfaction of NSW Office of Environment and Heritage / NSW NRAR Water. No untreated stormwater is to be directly discharged into any watercourse (including the Murray River), and no stormwater generated by the development is to traverse any adjoining property. The plan must incorporate Water Sensitive Urban Design techniques and be consistent with ‘The Blue Book: Managing Urban Stormwater’ produced by LANDCOM.
Note. The Act requires stormwater drainage work to be carried out only with the approval of the Council. The Local Government (General) Regulation 2005 specifies further requirements with respect to drainage.
Reason: To ensure the development is adequately serviced and to protect the natural environment and amenity of the area.
7. Internal roads must comply with the following requirements of section 4.2.7 of 'Planning for Bush Fire Protection 2006':
· Internal roads must be two wheel drive, all-weather roads.
· Dead end roads must incorporate a minimum 12 metres outer radius turning circle or other turning head design, and must be clearly signposted as a dead end.
· Traffic management devices must be constructed to facilitate access by emergency services vehicles.
· A minimum vertical clearance of 4 metres to any overhanging obstructions, including tree branches must be provided.
· Curves must have a minimum inner radius of 6 metres and must be minimal in number to allow for rapid access and egress.
· The minimum distance between inner and outer curves is six metres. Curves must have a minimum inner radius of 6 metres and must be minimal in number to allow for rapid access and egress.
· Maximum grades must not exceed 15 degrees and average grades must not be more than 10 degrees.
· Crossfall of the pavement must not be more than 10 degrees.
· Roads must not traverse through a wetland or other land potentially subject to periodic inundation (other than flood or storm surge).
· Roads must be clearly signposted and bridges clearly indicate load ratings.
· The internal road surfaces and bridges have a capacity to carry fully loaded fire fighting vehicles (15 tonnes).
Note: The developer is required to submit and have approved by Council the appropriate details/plans to ensure compliance with the above requirements prior to the release of the Construction Certificate.
Reason: To comply with NSW RFS requirements.
Conditions that must be fulfilled prior to the commencement of any works
8. The Applicant must, in accordance with the Public Health Act 2010:
· Develop and adhere to a quality assurance program for the private drinking water supply; and
· Provide a copy of the program to the local Public Health Unit.
The quality assurance program must be approved by Council prior to implementation.
Reason: To ensure compliance with the Public Health Act 2010.
9. An amended Construction Certificate must be submitted to, and approved by a nominated Certifying Authority prior to any building works taking place on the subject site.
Reason: To comply with the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.
10. An erosion and sediment control plan must be prepared and submitted to Council prior to the commencement of any works. Exposed surface soil must be stabilised as soon as possible to avoid potential erosion and dust issues. This plan must be approved by Council prior to the commencement of any works.
Reason: To ensure the erosion and sediment is appropriately managed during construction.
11. Temporary water closet accommodation must be provided onsite during construction. This facility must be located onsite so as to not create a nuisance to any adjoining properties.
Reason: To ensure suitable facilities are provided for workers during construction and to comply with requirements for Work Health and Safety on worksites.
12. An application under Section 68 of the Local Government Act 1993 must be lodged (application fees apply) and approved prior to any sanitary plumbing and drainage work, installation of sewage disposal system, operate a system of sewerage management, stormwater work, or water supply works commencing on the site. Once the Section 68 approval has been granted, before any sanitary plumbing and drainage work, installation of sewage disposal system, operate a system of sewerage management, stormwater work, or water supply work is commenced, a Notice of Work (NoW) must be submitted to Council 48 hours prior to works commencing. On completion of work, the licensed plumber / drainer must apply for an inspection and a Certificate of Compliance (CoC) must be submitted to Council. A sewer service diagram (SSD) must also be provided to Council upon completion of the drainage works.
Reason: To ensure that the installation of plumbing and drainage work is in accordance with Australian Standards and the Plumbing Code of Australia.
13. The Applicant must advise Council of the destination of any excavated material (i.e. from the proposed installation of septic holding tank). No earthworks are permitted to occur prior to Council consenting to the proposed destination of excavated material.
Reason: To protect the natural environment and amenity of the area.
14. A refuse facility must be provided to service the primitive camping ground. Details of this refuse facility must be provided and approved by Council prior to the commencement of any works.
Reason: To ensure the development is adequately serviced.
General Conditions that must be fulfilled
15. The development must be carried out in accordance with the plans submitted to and stamped by Council as part of the application.
Any amendments to these plans require the consent of Council.
Reason: To ensure that the development is carried out as assessed and approved by Council.
16. This consent is for the partial use of the land as a ‘camping ground’ only, as defined in the Murray Local Environmental Plan 2011.
A camping ground means an area of land that has access to communal amenities and on which campervans or tents, annexes or other similar portable and lightweight temporary shelters are, or are to be, installed, erected or placed for short term use, but does not include a caravan park.
The camping ground is to be used as a primitive camping ground as defined within the Local Government (Manufactured Home Estates, Caravan Parks, Camping Grounds and Moveable Dwellings) Regulation 2005).
A primitive camping ground means a camping ground that is specified in its approval as being a primitive camping ground.
For the purposes of this consent, a
campervan means a moveable dwelling (other than a caravan) that is designed so as to be capable of being registered (within the meaning of the Road Transport Act 2013) as a motor vehicle, and includes a camper trailer.
moveable dwelling means:
(a) any tent, or any van (other than a caravan) or other portable device (whether on wheels or not), used for human habitation.
The consent is not for a caravan park.
As defined in the Murray Local Environmental Plan 2011;
caravan park means land (including a camping ground) on which caravans (or caravans and other moveable dwellings) are, or are to be, installed or placed.
Reason: To ensure that the development is carried out as assessed and approved by Council.
17. The shed must not be used for residential accommodation or tourist and visitor accommodation and can only be used as a farm building as was approved. Any amendment to this use requires the consent of Murray River Council.
Under the Murray LEP 2011,
farm building means a structure the use of which is ancillary to an agricultural use of the landholding on which it is situated and includes a hay shed, stock holding yard, machinery shed, shearing shed, silo, storage tank, outbuilding or the like, but does not include a dwelling.
residential accommodation means a building or place used predominantly as a place of residence, and includes any of the following:
(a) attached dwellings,
(b) boarding houses,
(c) dual occupancies,
(d) dwelling houses,
(e) group homes,
(f) hostels,
(g) multi dwelling housing,
(h) residential flat buildings,
(i) rural workers’ dwellings,
(j) secondary dwellings,
(k) semi-detached dwellings,
(l) seniors housing,
(m) shop top housing,
but does not include tourist and visitor accommodation or caravan parks.
tourist and visitor accommodation means a building or place that provides temporary or short-term accommodation on a commercial basis, and includes any of the following:
(a) backpackers’ accommodation,
(b) bed and breakfast accommodation,
(c) farm stay accommodation,
(d) hotel or motel accommodation,
(e) serviced apartments,
but does not include:
(f) camping grounds, or
(g) caravan parks, or
(h) eco-tourist facilities.
Reason: To ensure that the development is carried out as assessed and approved by Council.
18. The approval is for a private primitive camping ground which must not be used for commercial purposes.
Reason: To ensure that the development is carried out as assessed and approved by Council.
19. No fill is permitted to be brought on site, without the prior written consent of Council.
Reason: To ensure that the development is carried out as assessed and approved by Council.
20. Solid waste generated on site must be collected and then disposed of appropriately within a designated and approved land fill.
Reason: To protect the natural environment.
21. No advertising signage is approved as part of this application. A development application must be submitted to, and approved by Council prior to the construction of any advertising signage on the subject site, unless the proposed advertising signage is classed as Exempt Development under the Murray Local Environmental Plan 2011 or State Environmental Planning Policy (Exempt and Complying Development Codes) 2008.
Reason: To ensure that the development is carried out as assessed and approved by Council.
22. The camping ground and occupiers must adhere to relevant legislation including the Protection of the Environmental Operations Act 1997, the Protection of the Environmental Operations (Noise Control) Regulation 2008, along with the requirements of the NSW EPA.
Reason: To limit any significant adverse impact to the amenity of the area.
23. Appropriate erosion and sedimentation control measures must be installed and maintained on site for the duration of construction works. Erosion and sediment controls must be installed in accordance with the NSW Department of Environment and Conservation “Erosion and Sediment Control – A Resource Guide for Local Councils”.
Reason: To prevent water pollution and protect the amenity of the adjoining area, and to comply with the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 and Council Policy.
24. There must be no clearing of any native vegetation.
Reason: To comply with the Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016.
25. Deleted.
26. During construction the proponent must undertake measures to minimise dust and noise and ensure that the impact on neighbouring properties is minimised.
Reason: To minimise environmental and amenity impacts in respect to construction of the development.
27. Any fencing along the property boundary of the subject site must be of a post and wire ‘rural style’.
Reason: To ensure that the amenity of the area is not adversely impacted upon.
28. All services to the development must be designed to withstand inundation from floodwater and must be capable of being disengaged and sealed in times of flooding.
Reason: To prevent contamination of floodwaters.
29. The septic holding tank must be pumped out as soon as it reaches 75% capacity. The disposal of wastewater must be undertaken by a suitably accredited specialist.
Reason: To protect the natural environment.
30. No caravan(s), manufactured home(s) or relocatable home(s) are to be installed / placed on the subject site at any time.
For the purposes of this condition, caravans, manufactured home(s), and relocatable home(s) are defined as:
“caravan means a moveable dwelling that is designed so as to be capable of being registered (within the meaning of the Road Transport Act 2013) as a trailer, but does not include a camper trailer”.
“manufactured home means a self-contained dwelling (that is, a dwelling that includes at least one kitchen, bathroom, bedroom and living area and that also includes toilet and laundry facilities), being a dwelling:
(a) that comprises one or more major sections, and
(b) that is not a motor vehicle, trailer or other registrable vehicle within the meaning of the Road Transport Act 2013,
and includes any associated structures that form part of the dwelling”.
“Relocatable home means:
(a) a manufactured home, or
(b) any other moveable dwelling (whether or not self-contained) that comprises one or more major sections, including any associated structure that forms part of the dwelling,
but does not include a tent, caravan or campervan or any moveable dwelling that is a vehicle of a kind that is capable of being registered within the meaning of the Road Transport Act 2013”.
Reason: To ensure that the development is carried out as assessed and approved by Council.
31. The development must comply with the Local Government (Manufactured Home Estates, Caravan Parks, Camping Grounds and Moveable Dwellings) Regulation 2005 and in accordance with the relevant requirements of Subdivision 9 of Division 3 of Part 3.
Reason: To comply with the Local Government (Manufactured Home Estates, Caravan Parks, Camping Grounds and Moveable Dwellings) Regulation 2005.
32. A maximum of ten (10) campervans and tents are permitted to use the camping ground at any one time.
Reason: To comply with the Local Government (Manufactured Home Estates, Caravan Parks, Camping Grounds and Moveable Dwellings) Regulation 2005.
33. An annexe or campervan must not be allowed to be installed closer than six (6) metres to any other annexe, campervan or tent.
Reason: To comply with the Local Government (Manufactured Home Estates, Caravan Parks, Camping Grounds and Moveable Dwellings) Regulation 2005.
34. A tent must not be allowed to be installed closer than 6 metres to any annexe or campervan or closer than 3 metres to any other tent.
Reason: To comply with the Local Government (Manufactured Home Estates, Caravan Parks, Camping Grounds and Moveable Dwellings) Regulation 2005.
35. Unoccupied campervans and tents must not remain in the camping ground for more than twenty-four (24) hours.
Reason: To comply with the Local Government (Manufactured Home Estates, Caravan Parks, Camping Grounds and Moveable Dwellings) Regulation 2005.
36. A person must not stay in a campervan, tent, annex or other similar portable and lightweight temporary shelter within the primitive camping ground for a total of more than 50 days in any 12 month period.
Reason: To comply with the Local Government (Manufactured Home Estates, Caravan Parks, Camping Grounds and Moveable Dwellings) Regulation 2005.
37. The camping ground must be supplied or connected to potable water supply, toilet and refuse disposal facilities to the satisfaction of Council. The water supply service must comply with:
(a) the Plumbing and Drainage Act 2011 and any regulations under that Act, and
(b) the requirements of any relevant statutory body.
The water supplied for human consumption or domestic purposes must comply with the Australian Drinking Water Guidelines published in 2004 by the National Health and Medical Research Council.
Reason: To ensure the camping ground is supplied with adequate potable water supply.
38. No relocatable home, rigid annexe or associated structure is permitted to be constructed on the site at any time.
Reason: To comply with the Local Government (Manufactured Home Estates, Caravan Parks, Camping Grounds and Moveable Dwellings) Regulation 2005.
39. All services to the development must be designed to withstand inundation from floodwaters and be able to be disengaged in times of flooding and capped to prevent inundation/contamination/failure.
Reason: To comply with the Murray Development Control Plan 2012.
40. The entirety of the subject site is flood liable land. There must be no filling of the site. The camping ground is not permitted to be occupied should there be a flood event that will affect the property. All campervans and tents must be removed from the site in such an event. Council cannot guarantee access and egress during flood events.
Reason: To address flood impacts and to ensure the protection of the environment.
41. Deleted.
42. No dwelling houses are permitted to be constructed on the subject site.
Reason: To ensure that the development is carried out as assessed and approved by Council.
43. The site must be maintained in an environmentally sound manner during works. Designated waste containment areas must be provided on site, and maintained so as to prevent any windblown litter escaping from the site.
During installation the proponent must undertake measures to minimise dust and noise.
Reason: To comply with the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997, and to preserve the environmental health and amenity of the adjoining area.
44. Vehicles must be clean and free of debris prior to leaving the site during construction. Deposited material may be ordered to be removed at the applicant/operator’s expense.
Reason: To ensure that sediment is not trafficked onto Council’s road network.
45. Any damage or deterioration to any portion of Council property including road reserves, during construction must be reinstated to its original condition at the owner's expense to the satisfaction of Council.
Reason: To maintain safe access for pedestrians and to protect the amenity of the adjoining area.
46. Water supply work or sewerage work that is plumbing and drainage work within the meaning of the Plumbing and Drainage Act 2011 must comply with that Act and the regulations under that Act. Any water supply work or sewerage work that is not plumbing and drainage work under that Act, and any stormwater drainage work, must comply with the Plumbing Code of Australia.
Reason: Council and Statutory requirement of Local Government (General) Regulation 2005.
47. All aspects of the camping ground must be setback at least 100m from the high bank of the Murray River.
Reason: To protect the riverine environment.
48. No vehicular access to the Murray River is allowed at any time. Pedestrian access to the River Murray must be restricted to constructed pathways and a vegetated strip of river frontage must be retained as a buffer between the River and camping sites and amenities.
Reason: To ensure that the development is carried out as assessed and approved by Council.
49. Under Section 120 of the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997, it is an offence to pollute waters. As such, any stormwater generated by the proposal must be adequately disposed of via a method approved by Council’s Engineering Department. Details of stormwater disposal must be provided to Council’s Engineering Department for approval prior to operation of the site as a camping ground.
Reason: To minimise pollution and to protect the water quality of the River Murray, to ensure compliance with the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997, and to ensure stormwater is adequately and appropriately disposed of from the camping ground.
50. Any additional development on the allotment will be required to be applied for and approved by Council.
Reason: To ensure that the development is carried out as assessed and approved by Council.
51. To ensure the proposed camping ground is able to be adequately serviced by emergency vehicles, the applicant must liaise with the relevant emergency services to ensure emergency vehicles can access the subject site and to ensure compliance with the Terms of Easement affecting the subject site.
Reason: To ensure that the proposed camping ground can be adequately serviced by emergency services.
52. Noise from the camping ground must be managed and noise mitigation measures are to be implemented so as not to constitute offensive noise to the neighbouring properties. The noise level emitted from the property must not exceed the background noise level in any Octave Band Centre Frequency (31.5 Hz – 8k Hz inclusive) by more than 5 dBA at the boundary of any affected property after 12:00am on any given day.
Reason: To reduce any detrimental effects noise may have on surrounding properties and to comply with the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997.
53. Works must not commence on the site before 7am on weekdays and Saturdays and 8am on Sundays and public holidays. All works must cease by 8pm on any day.
Reason: To comply with the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 and Regulations.
54. If any Aboriginal object is discovered and/or harmed in, or under the land, while undertaking the proposed development activities, the proponent must:
o Not further harm the object;
o Immediately cease all work at the particular location;
o Secure the area so as to avoid further harm to the Aboriginal object;
o Notify NSW OEH as soon as practical on 131 555, providing any details of the Aboriginal object and its location; and
o Not recommence any work at the particular location unless authorised in writing by NSW OEH.
In the event that skeletal remains are unexpectedly encountered during the activity, all work must stop immediately, the area must be secured to prevent unauthorised access, and NSW Police and NSW OEH must be contacted.
All reasonable precautions must be taken to prevent damage to Aboriginal objects.
For more information please refer to the NSW Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water (NSW OEH) document entitled: Due diligence Code of Practice for the Protection of Aboriginal Objects in New South Wales, available:
http://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/resources/cultureheritage/ddcop/10798ddcop.pdf.
Reason: To protect Aboriginal heritage.
55. The developer must ensure that the camping ground is serviced by appropriate telecommunication connections.
Reason: To satisfactorily service the camping ground.
56. All conditions of consent must be fulfilled to the standard of Council and at the expense of the developer.
Reason: To ensure the development is carried out in accordance with Council’s standards.
NSW EPA Conditions that must be fulfilled
57. The proponent must take all necessary precautions and implement measures to prevent pollution of waterways during the proposed works.
Reason: To comply with NSW EPA requirements.
58. Deleted.
NSW Crown Lands Condition that must be fulfilled
59. The proponent must not:
· encroach upon the adjacent and adjoining Crown land,
· remove any vegetation from the adjacent and adjoining Crown land,
· stockpile materials, equipment or machinery on the adjacent and adjoining Crown land,
· use the adjacent and adjoining Crown land as access,
· direct stormwater discharges on the adjacent and adjoining Crown land, or
· use the adjacent and adjoining Crown land as an asset protection zone.
Reason: To comply with NSW Crown Lands requirements.
NSW Rural Fire Services Conditions that must be fulfilled
Asset Protection Zones
60. At the commencement of use for primitive camping and in perpetuity the property around each primitive camping site to a distance of 50 metres, must be maintained as an inner protection area (IPA), and 10 metres, must be maintained as an outer protection area (OPA) as outlined below.
(a) The inner protection area must comprise of the following:
· minimal fine fuel at ground level;
· vegetation that does not provide a continuous path to the building/camp sites for the transfer of fire;
· shrubs and trees that do not form a continuous canopy and vegetation is planted/cleared into clumps rather than continuous rows;
· species that retain dead material or deposit excessive quantities of ground fuel are avoided;
· shrubs and trees are pruned or removed so they do not touch or overhang the building/camp sites; and
· vegetation is located far enough away from the building/camp sites so that plants will not ignite the building/camping structures by direct flame contact or radiant heat emission.
(b) The outer protection area must comprise of the following:
· vegetation that does not provide a continuous path for the transfer of fire; and
· fuel loadings are maintained below 8 tonnes per hectare by mowing, slashing or other approved hazard reduction methods.
Reason: To comply with NSW RFS requirements and to provide sufficient space and maintain reduced fuel loads so as to ensure radiant heat levels of buildings are below critical limits and to prevent direct flame contact with a building.
Water and Utilities
61. Water, electricity and gas must comply with the following requirements of Section 4.1.3 of 'Planning for Bush Fire Protection 2006':
· A hardened ground surface for truck access must be supplied up to and within 4 metres of the water source.
· A 65mm metal Storz outlet with a gate or ball valve must be provided.
· The water tank if located above ground must be of a non-combustible material.
· The gate or ball valve, pipes and tank penetration must be adequate for full 50mm inner diameter water flow through the Storz fitting and must be metal.
· All associated fittings to the tank must be non-combustible.
· A minimum 5hp or 3kW petrol or diesel powered pump must be made available to the water supply.
· Reticulated or bottled gas must be installed and maintained in accordance with Australian Standard AS/NZS 1596:2014: 'The storage and handling of LP gas' and the requirements of relevant authorities. Metal piping must be used.
· The water tank and storage water trailer must be filled at the beginning of each tourist season. The storage water trailer and pump must be tested annually to ensure full operational functionality.
Reason: To comply with NSW RFS requirements and to provide adequate services of water for the protection of buildings during and after the passage of a bush fire, and to locate gas and electricity so as not to contribute to the risk of fire to a building.
Access
62. Internal roads must comply with Section 4.2.7 of 'Planning for Bush Fire Protection 2006'.
Reason: To comply with NSW RFS requirements and to provide safe operational access to structures and water supply for emergency services, while residents are seeking to evacuate from an area.
Evacuation and Emergency Management
63. An Emergency/Evacuation Plan must be prepared detailing the following:
i. under what circumstances will the complex be evacuated;
ii. where will occupants be evacuated to;
iii. roles and responsibilities of persons co-ordinating the evacuation;
iv. roles and responsibilities of persons remaining with the complex after evacuation; and
v. a procedure to contact the NSW Rural Fire Service District Office / NSW Fire Brigade and inform them of the evacuation and where they will be evacuated to.
Reason: To comply with NSW RFS requirements and to provide safe operational access for emergency services personnel in suppressing a bush fire, while residents are accessing or egressing an area.
64. The nominated evacuation point on the sandbar is deemed to experience a radiant heat of greater than 2kW/m² and as such is unsafe. The preferred emergency and evacuation plan would be to leave the site early on fire danger days.
Reason: To comply with NSW RFS requirements and to provide suitable emergency and evacuation (and relocation) arrangements for occupants of special fire protection purpose developments.
NSW RFS Advice
Riparian Areas
The asset protection zones (APZ) required as part of the development will encompass land that will be located within a riparian corridor/area. Ecological management of the riparian area may conflict with that required for the APZ’s.
In this regard the applicant will need to liaise with the relevant Government Department to identify their management requirements do not conflict with those required for the APZ’s by the NSW Rural Fire Service.
Conditions that must be fulfilled prior to the release of the Occupation Certificate or use of the farm building
65. The applicant must not allow or permit the building (or part of the building, in the case of alteration or additions) to be occupied or used, until:-
a. All conditions of this consent have been completed in full;
b. An application for an Occupation Certificate has been completed and returned to the Principal Certifying Authority; and
c. The Principal Certifying Authority has issued an Occupation Certificate.
Reason: To comply with the requirements of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 and to ensure compliance with conditions.
Conditions that must be fulfilled prior to the use of the site as a camping ground
66. The applicant must obtain a Section 68 Approval in accordance with the Local Government Act 1993 to:
F2 Operate a camping ground.
The approval to operate cannot be issued until all facilities required by Subdivision 9 of Division 3 of Part 3 of the Local Government (Manufactured Home Estates, Caravan Parks, Camping Grounds and Moveable Dwellings) Regulation 2005 have been approved and constructed/installed to the satisfaction of Council.
Reason: To comply with the requirements of the Local Government Act 1993.
67. Prior to issue of an approval to operate the camping ground the applicant must pay to Council an inspection fee in accordance with Council’s fees policy applicable at the time for the cost of providing inspections of works.
Reason: To enable Council to undertake an inspection of completed works.
68. The Council will not grant an approval to operate the camping ground unless it is satisfied that it complies with the conditions of consent and the requirements of Part 3, Division 3, Subdivision 9 of the Local Government (Manufactured Home Estates, Caravan Parks, Camping Grounds and Moveable Dwellings) Regulation 2005.
Reason: To comply with the Local Government (Manufactured Home Estates, Caravan Parks, Camping Grounds and Moveable Dwellings) Regulation 2005.
69. Deleted.
70. Any unauthorised structures/development must be removed from the subject site, prior to the issue of the Section 68 Approval to Operate.
Reason: To ensure that the development is carried out as assessed and approved by Council.
71. Occupation - The Applicant must not allow or permit the site of the camping ground to be occupied or used, until:
a. All conditions of this consent have been completed in full.
Reason: To comply with the requirements of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 and to ensure compliance with conditions of consent.
NSW NRAR Water Advice to Applicant
No permanent structures are to be erected without prior approval within 40m of the high bank of the Murray River, within the watercourse.
There must be no deposition or excavation without prior approval within 40m of the high bank of the Murray River or within the watercourse.
Vegetation within the watercourse or within 40 m of the high bank of Murray River is not to be removed or harmed.
Reason: To advise the Applicant of NSW NRAR Water’s requirements.
Advice to applicant
As outlined in Clause 74 of the Local Government (Manufactured Home Estates, Caravan Parks, Camping Grounds and Moveable Dwellings) Regulation 2005, it is noted that the prior approval of the Council is not required for:
· the installation of a tent on a camp site within a camping ground.
· the installation of a campervan on a camp site within a camping ground
An exemption provided for by this advice applies in respect of the installation of a campervan or tent only if such installation is carried out by or with the consent of the holder of the approval to operate the camping ground.
Reason: To advise the Applicant of relevant legislation.
The subject site and surrounding area is currently zoned RU1 Primary Production under the Murray Local Environmental Plan 2011. This land zone allows agricultural type uses and development to occur. It is noted that adjoining properties zoned RU1 Primary Production are permitted to utilise the land for agricultural purposes providing they adhere to relevant legislation, and that the issuing of consent to use part of the subject site as a camping ground does not impede the ongoing use of surrounding RU1 Primary Production zoned land for agricultural purposes.
Reason: To advise the Applicant that adjoining properties are permitted to conduct agricultural activities.
The land subject to this consent may have restrictive covenants applying to it. It is the responsibility of the owner and builder to ensure that covenants are adhered to. Council does not enforce or regulate covenants and therefore accepts no responsibility for checking the compliance of building design with such covenants.
Reason: To ensure compliance with the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.
It is noted that it is the responsibility of the Applicant to ensure that the development is consistent with the NSW Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water (NSW OEH) document entitled: Due Diligence Code of Practice for the Protection of Aboriginal Objects in New South Wales, available:
http://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/resources/cultureheritage/ddcop/10798ddcop.pdf.
Reason: To ensure compliance with the Due Diligence Code of Practice for the Protection of Aboriginal Objects.
Underground assets may exist in the area that is subject to the application. In the interests of health and safety and in order to protect damage to third party assets please contact Dial Before You Dig at www.1100.com.au or telephone on 1100 before excavating or erecting structures. If alterations are required to the configuration, size, form or design of the development upon contacting the Dial Before You Dig service, an amendment to the development consent (or a new development application) may be necessary.
Individuals owe asset owners a duty of care that must be observed when working in the vicinity of plant or assets on the relevant property via contacting the Dial Before You Dig service in advance of any construction or planning activities.
Reason: To protect underground assets.
It is the responsibility of the applicant to check, understand and seek assistance where needed so as to ensure full compliance with the conditions of this Development Consent. Please contact Murray River Council on 1300 087 004 if there is any difficulty in understanding or complying with any of the above conditions
Reason: To ensure the Applicant is aware of their obligations.
The development must be in accordance with the relevant provisions and Regulations of the Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016, the Fisheries Management Act 1994, the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974, the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997, and all other applicable legislation.
Reason: To comply with relevant legislation.
The proponent should be aware that under Section 120 of the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 it is an offence to pollute waters.
Reason: To comply with NSW EPA requirements.
It is the Applicant’s responsibility to ensure compliance with the requirements of the Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (DDA). Note: Compliance with the Building Code of Australia does not necessarily meet the requirements of the DDA. You are advised to seek advice from the Australian Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (phone (02) 9284 9600) in respect of your application.
Reason: To comply with the Disability Discrimination Act 1992.
26 March 2019 |
File Number: -
Author: Kerri Keogh, Manager Office of the General Manager
Authoriser: Des Bilske, General Manager
Discussion
w
01/03: Local Government NSW Weekly
Indices of General Circulars dated 22 February, 1 March, 8 March and 15 March 2019 have been forwarded to Councillors and Senior Staff via email.
02/03: Australian Local Government Association (ALGA) News
Newsletters dated 22 February, 8 March and 15 March 2019 have been forwarded to Councillors and Senior Staff via email.
03/03: Local Government NSW
Forwarding a Media Release dated 19 February 2019 welcoming the announcement than an ALP State Government would scrap the mandatory application of the Medium Density Housing Code was a win for common sense and would help prevent character destruction across a range of suburban neighbourhoods. Refer Attachment 1.
04/03: St Michael’s Primary School
Forwarding correspondence dated 22 February 2019 extending appreciation to Council for the continued support and generous donation of $100 towards the 2018 St Michael’s School Presentation Night. Refer Attachment 2.
05/03: Local Government NSW
Forwarding a Media Release dated 26 February 2019 welcoming a “rock-solid” guarantee that local water utilities will not be privatised if a Liberal-National Government is re-elected in NSW. Refer Attachment 3.
06/03: Local Government NSW
Forwarding a Media Release dated 26 February 2019 advising that an election pledge of $1 billion to help fix local roads and repair country bridges in NSW was great news for regional and rural councils. Refer Attachment 4.
07/03: Member for Murray, Austin Evans MP
Forwarding a Media Release dated 27 February 2019 announcing that the Perricoota Pop & Pour Festival will benefit from a $20,000 grant in NSW Government funding under Round Two of the 2019 Flagship Event Fund. Refer Attachment 5.
08/03: Member for Murray, Austin Evans MP
Forwarding a Media Release dated 26 February 2019 announcing that the Wakool Community Association will receive $10,000 from the NSW Government to assist in staging the Wakool Fishing Classic, the Cultivate Ball and the Wakool Sheep Races. Refer Attachment 6.
09/03: Local Government NSW
Forwarding a Media Release dated 5 March 2019 advising that an ALP election pledge will significantly boost the quality and availability of early childhood education for families, according to NSW councils who own and operate more than 300 early childhood education and care services across the state. Refer Attachment 7.
10/03: Country Mayors Association of NSW
Forwarding Minutes of the General Meeting held on Friday 8 March 2019 in Sydney. Refer Attachment 8.
11/03: Local Government NSW
Forwarding a Media Release dated 9 March 2019 advising that the state-wide Save Our Recycling campaign has welcomed NSW Labor’s pledge to reinvest revenue collected from the Waste Levy into recycling facilities, a circular economy fund and support for the local government sector in NSW. Refer Attachment 9.
12/03: Member for Murray, Austin Evans MP
Forwarding a Media Release dated 13 March 2019 advising that drought affected communities across Southern NSW will now have access to three new frontline mental health workers as part of the NSW Nationals & Liberal Government’s $6.3M mental health drought assistance package. Refer Attachment 10.
13/03: ABC Television
Forwarding correspondence dated 13 March 2019 responding to Council’s concerns, expressed to the ABC’s Audience and Consumer Affairs team, about the depiction of Echuca-Moama in Episode 1 of the currently airing Season 2 of ABC TV’s Get Krack!n’. Refer Attachment 11.
1. LGNSW
- Councils welcome planning platform announcement ⇩
2. St
Michaels Primary School - Thank You Letter For Donation ⇩
3. LGNSW
- Pledge to keep local water utilities in local hands welcomed by councils ⇩
4. LGNSW
- Funding for local roads and country bridges welcome ⇩
5. Member
for Murray - Flagship Event Fund Perricoota Pop & Pour Festival ⇩
6. Member
for Murray - Wakool Community Assoc ⇩
7. LGNSW
- Councils welcome $500M early childhood pledge ⇩
8. Country
Mayors Association NSW - Minutes 8 March 2019 ⇩
9. LGNSW
- Save Our Recycling Campaign welcomes decisive steps to address crisis from
Labor_Greens ⇩
10. Member
for Murray - Drought Farm Gate counsellors appointed ⇩
11. ABC
Television - Get Krack!n' Season 2 - Episode 1 - response to Council's concerns
⇩
26 March 2019 |
File Number: -
Author: Kerri Keogh, Manager Office of the General Manager
Authoriser: Des Bilske, General Manager
That the Sundry Delegates Reports of the Mayor and Councillors be received by the Council and reasonable out of pocket expenses be met by Council. |
Discussion
The Mayor, Councillor CR Bilkey reported on his attendance at the following meetings and functions:
· 26 Feb: Meeting Murray River Council & Edward River Council RE: reinstatement of train passenger service between Echuca and Deniliquin – Moama
· 26 Feb: Pre-Council Meeting Presentations & Briefing – Moama
· 26 Feb: Ordinary Meeting of Council – Moama
· 28 Feb: Phone Interview with 3SH
· 1 Mar: Interview with Edge FM
· 4 Mar: United Hospital Auxiliaries of NSW: Murray Region Zone Day – Mathoura
· 6 Mar: Meeting with Member for Farrer, Sussan Ley MP – Moama
· 8 Mar: Phone Interview with ABC Riverina
· 11 Mar: Radio EMFM Segment – Echuca
· 12 Mar: NSW Men’s Senior Amateur Championships Official Dinner – Murray Downs
· 14 Mar: NSW Men’s Senior Amateur Championships Official Presentation – Murray Downs
· 20 Mar: Echuca Legacy Group Change-Over Luncheon – Moama
· 20 Mar: ‘Meet the Council’ Session – Barham
· 21 Mar: ‘Meet the Council’ Session – Tooleybuc
The Deputy Mayor, Councillor GS Campbell reported on her attendance at the following meetings and functions:
· 26 Feb: Pre-Council Meeting Presentations & Briefing – Moama
· 26 Feb: Ordinary Meeting of Council – Moama
Councillor A Aquino reported on his attendance at the following meetings and functions:
· 19 Feb: Murray Darling Association Meeting
· 26 Feb: Pre-Council Meeting Presentations & Briefing – Moama
· 26 Feb: Ordinary Meeting of Council – Moama
Councillor NF Cohen reported on her attendance at the following meetings and functions:
· 26 Feb: Pre-Council Meeting Presentations & Briefing – Moama
· 26 Feb: Ordinary Meeting of Council – Moama
· 27 Feb: Meeting with Office of Local Government Community Engagement Officer – Moama
· 1 Mar: Council Representative at Echuca Moama Apex Gift – Moama
· 5 Mar: Friends of Old Moama Meeting – Moama
· 12 Mar: C4EM Meet the Candidates (for State Election) – Moama
· 13 Mar: Women in Local Government Forum, Leadership Across the Riverina Murray – Wagga
· 14 Mar: Dog Park/Off Lead Community Forum – Moama
· 18 Mar: LGNSW Chairing & Effective Meeting Procedures Workshop – Corowa
· 19 Mar: Moama Recreation Reserve Management Committee Meeting – Moama
· 20 Mar: ‘Meet the Council’ Session – Barham
Councillor A Crowe reported on her attendance at the following meetings and functions:
· 26 Feb: Pre-Council Meeting Presentations & Briefing – Moama
· 26 Feb: Ordinary Meeting of Council – Moama
Councillor NH Gorey reported on his attendance at the following meetings and functions:
· 26 Feb: Pre-Council Meeting Presentations & Briefing – Moama
· 26 Feb: Ordinary Meeting of Council – Moama
Councillor AM Mathers reported on his attendance at the following meetings and functions:
· 1 Mar: MRSG Board Meeting RE: Irrigation water – Deniliquin RSL Club
· 4 Mar: Wakool Memorial Hall Committee Meeting – Wakool
· 5 Mar: ‘Pause the Plan’ Meeting RE: Irrigation water – Deniliquin RSL Club
· 7 Mar: Barham Town Flood Study Meeting – Barham
· 11 Mar: MRSG Meeting with Minister for Water & Environment, Nial Blair RE: ‘Pause the Plan’ issues with irrigation water – Deniliquin
· 20 Mar: ‘Meet the Council’ Session – Barham
· 21 Mar: ‘Meet the Council’ Session – Tooleybuc
Councillor TE Weyrich reported on his attendance at the following meetings and functions:
· 26 Feb: Pre-Council Meeting Presentations & Briefing – Moama
· 26 Feb: Ordinary Meeting of Council – Moama
· Picnic Point Pontoon Inspection x 2 – Mathoura
Councillor GW Wise reported on his attendance at the following meetings and functions:
· 26 Feb: Pre-Council Meeting Presentations & Briefing – Moama
· 26 Feb: Ordinary Meeting of Council – Moama
· 13 Mar: Mathoura Recreation Reserve Management Committee Meeting – Mathoura
26 March 2019 |